24 November 2004

Magnolia Benefits From Millennium Vision



Magnolia Benefits From Millennium Vision
P. Scott Cummins © 2004 The Urbane R

It had been a good year for the Magnolia couple. They now have a home to serve them for many years to come, and their work together was proving beneficial for the neighbors - raising their standing in the community. Young and hard working, they would spend their lives together facing whatever uncertainties came their way. With the arrival of offspring, they together coped with incredible fatigue placed on them by the demands of parenting. In many ways they were just a typical Magnolia couple. But they could never be typical, because they are a Barn Owl pair, living twenty five feet off the ground in a cedar nest box – in the back corner of a Magnolia yard. And they live a lifestyle that many of their human counterparts would find enviable: flying off around this time every year to spend the winter in desert areas of Arizona, Southern California and Northern Mexico. Enviable as well is that their human neighbors love them so much, but for the very reason you probably wouldn’t want to be them: as their voracious eating habits involves rodents of all kinds. Particularly moles, because they are so small and easy to pick off when surfacing at night. And rats, because with the hatching of baby owlets, there are now hungry mouths to feed.

But this hasn’t happened yet. And it won’t without your help. In the 1980’s a dialogue started between gardening enthusiasts and the environmental movement. An idea began to take shape: your backyard as a place both beautiful and enjoyable to humans, while also beneficial as habitat for native plants and animals. Humans raising their awareness, living more in harmony with the environment in which they live. Enjoying nature, and reaping some benefits along the way.

In the mid-1960’s I was growing up in Montlake, the Seattle neighborhood inside a ‘L’ shape formed by the Washington Park Arboretum and the extensive Interlaken Drive greenbelt. Back in those days, some basements would flood during periods of extensive rain. Ground in the Interlaken greenbelt would saturate, causing small springs of water to literally erupt in yards along Boyer Avenue – which years before had been an extensive marshy bog. Citizens complained - something had to be done. City storm drainage systems were upgraded, and year-round streams became seasonal trickles. The downside? Native plants accustomed to the seasonal climate cycles of our region were unable to compete – so invasive non-native plants like English Ivy virtually took over in the greenbelts.

Today our city is virtually swarming with rats – but as a kid forty years ago I never saw a single one. Why? In those days Seattle had resident wild coyote, which we did see, almost every day. Particularly if we had not coaxed in our wayward Siamese cat that evening, and were now out with flashlights looking for her. Somehow she made it home every night – and lived with our family for almost twenty years. The primary food sources for the coyote were rodents. So when humans decided the coyote had to go, the rats lost their major predator. We humans had made a decision: baits and poisons left out for the rodents were less dangerous for our pets and children than four-legged varmint eaters. Somehow I think we miscalculated on that one.

There are a few coyote in Discovery Park. But they are elusive, and seem to somehow understand that any direct interaction with humans will bring on lethal consequences. The fur and bone in their scat is all I have observed in the park, yet I walk there regularly and have put in hundreds of hours planting trees (and pulling ivy) over the years. So when it comes to our rodent problem, the coyote of Discovery Park are not going to come to our rescue.

But here in Magnolia we are in luck – because of Discovery Park, and the small population of noble raptors which fly back every Spring. Yes, our friendly, sun-loving, see-you-in-Sonora Barn Owl neighbors. We humans would be mighty advised to help get the word out among their friends – about how Magnolia would be a great place to settle down and raise a family: as in many more silent, hungry owls that eat their weight in rodents every night kind of families.

The challenge for us is that great working conditions for barn owls require plenty of overhanging branches of the tree kind. We made a start with the city’s Millennium Tree Project in 2000, which encompassed a several year effort at planting trees along our streets and sidewalks – and culminated in actually giving them away for yards. Some 2,500 trees were planted in Magnolia during that period, and we are now starting to see just a hint of what we can accomplish on behalf of our friendly Barn Owl and (hopefully) future neighbors. While Discovery Park’s Barn Owls have left for a sunny winter in the desert, the good news for us caring humans is that winter is the best time to plant trees. My advice is to head on down to the Garden Center, they can help you plant a tree which will be perfect well away from your house – so that perhaps in years ahead its mighty growth can provide a home for some lovely Barn Owls that heard about Magnolia – while wintering in the desert.

(We want to hear your story of encouraging backyard habitat - like putting in a native plant garden, and other community-spirited acts of the environmental kind – email us at nature@pscottcummins.com)

23 November 2004

Brad Stine Is Who Bono Imagines Himself To Be

Anyone around me for more than a few minutes knows that I am an unabashed admirer of Bono, through his work with that little music group known as U-2, largely because (as Bono might say) he got off his fat ass (sorry Michael Powell, love your Dad) and involved himself with this planet. Like someone we all should be.
(Still mystified why Republicans are 'down' with Bono? Click here.)
Unlike me, an awesome 'social commentator' (they used to be called comedians) named Brad Stine is a man who refrains from vulgar language. Like someone we all should be.

Just like all those other disciples of Jesus that you know about, Brad is one cutting edge, no-compromise kind of man. Like someone we all should be.

People, get ready, because you, too, can be just...

Like someone we all should be.

Check out this unabashed fair-comment rip-off from The New Yorker. Guaranteed you'll want to catch Brad live.

_____________________________________________________


STANDUP FOR THE LORD
by ADAM GREEN
How funny can a Christian comedian be ?
Issue of 2004-08-09 and 16
Posted 2004-08-02

Most accounts of religious awakening feature a dark night of the soul, a moment just before God reveals his grace, when everything looks hopeless and faith seems impossible. For Brad Stine, a forty-four-year-old politically conservative, Evangelical Christian standup comic, that moment came at the end of the last millennium, when his agent and his manager both stopped returning his calls. For more than a decade, Stine (who was nine when he found Christ) had earned a decent living in show business—first as a magician, then as a clean, though not overtly pious, comedian, doing his bits in front of brick walls in clubs across the country. But his career had slackened, and his chances of making it to the big time—the “Tonight Show,” his own sitcom—had grown remote. Mired in depression and doubt, he started to question his most fundamental beliefs. As Stine recalls it, “I thought: Jesus, either you’re not real or I’m missing something.”

Then, one afternoon in the tiny kitchen of a one-bedroom apartment in Las Flores, California, where Stine was living with his pregnant wife and young son, he began to pray. He asked God to take over, to tell him what to do, offering to forgo wealth and fame in return for peace of mind. “It was Abraham and Isaac,” Stine told me. “I finally brought the knife down on my life and my career, and said, ‘I’m willing to sacrifice this thing. I’m willing to let go of what I love most—my comedy—in order to have God.’”

Later that day, he got an offer to appear on a televised Christmas special on North Carolina’s Inspiration Network, and he realized, he says, “I was a mainstream artist who wanted everything the secular entertainment industry had to offer, but he—God—had bigger plans.” Stine quit the club circuit, found new management, and started working a different set of rooms, bringing what he calls his “progressive, contemporary-style” humor to a new audience. The enthusiastic response showed Stine that he had at last found his calling—that his career had become a ministry. “What these churches are becoming, as venues, is sort of what those comedy clubs were in the seventies and eighties,” he told me. “It’s this gigantic market of people who literally have never had this before. I’ve been stinkin’ digging for years in this mine, and suddenly it’s like—oh-ho-ho-ho—I’ve struck the mother lode.”

Last year turned out to be one of Stine’s busiest ever. He played dozens of church dates, at five thousand dollars a show—more than he used to make in a week in the clubs. He recorded his first DVD, “Put a Helmet On!,” at the Thomas Road Baptist Church, in Lynchburg, Virginia—or, as he sometimes calls it, “Jerry Falwell’s joint.” He went on an eighteen-city tour with the Promise Keepers men’s ministry. He appeared on Pat Robertson’s television show, “The 700 Club,” and he entertained at private holiday parties for the staffs of Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network, Falwell’s church, and Promise Keepers. Recently, there have been discussions about his performing at the Republican National Convention in New York, later this month.

Stine went back on the road this year to try out material for a second DVD. His first gig was in Estes Park, Colorado, a small town about forty miles northwest of Boulder, where he performed at the Y.M.C.A. of the Rockies for several hundred Christian men on a spiritual retreat. His Saturday-night and Sunday-morning shows capped a weekend whose highlights included a lecture by a motivational speaker, Dr. Steve Farrar, called “Men Leading the Charge: God’s Game Plan for a Man and His Family,” and a series of workshops, among them “Missions Awareness: The Muslim World,” whose moderator said, “9/11 is a natural outgrowth of what the Koran tells its followers to do.”

As he waited to go on, Stine paced the carpeted floor of a classroom in the auditorium’s basement. (The only things that Stine asks for in his makeshift greenrooms are a can of Mountain Dew and a Hershey bar, which he once heard was what David Letterman eats before he goes on the air.) Stine has shaggy, streaked-blond hair and thin, L-shaped sideburns, and he bears a striking resemblance to Denis Leary. He was wearing a patterned knit shirt, untucked, and dark wool pants, with black square-toed shoes. Just before showtime, Stine walked down the hall and peeked inside the auditorium. Hundreds of white men, wearing turtlenecks, flannel shirts, or crewneck sweaters, were holding their hands above their heads, palms up, and singing, “God is awesome in this place,” accompanied by a guitar-and-keyboard duo. “Whee—I’m going to put a nice, big damper on the experience they’re entering into,” Stine said. “‘You’re a Christian comedian? Where’s your puppet?’ If you grew up in the Church, it was not known for its stinkin’ high-quality entertainment. A pastor might tell a joke, and it usually began, ‘There were these two mules . . .’”

Then it was showtime. Accompanied by pounding rock music, Stine ran out, grabbed the microphone, announced that he was feeling crazy, and launched into his routine. His style is frantic, aggressive, and caustic, with echoes of Robin Williams, Sam Kinison, and George Carlin, who is his comedy hero. His frequent use of the word “stinking” makes you realize how often he would say “fucking” if he didn’t work clean.

A lot of Stine’s material that night came from “Put a Helmet On!,” whose title refers to the weakening of the American character caused by such politically correct follies as mandatory helmet laws for bicyclists. Stine longs for the days when Christian values guided the nation and, as he jokes, the homeless were handed axes, pointed toward a grove of trees, and told, “There’s your duplex.” He aimed most of his barbs at liberals and unbelievers, but Christians took flak, too. He did an impression of a Protestant, whining, “Satan made me lose my job!” (“No—your incompetence made you lose your job!”), and made fun of churches that organize “Harry Potter” book burnings (“Here’s a good rule of thumb: If Hitler tried it—maybe go the other way”). A bit about Christians who need tabbed pages to find Genesis in the Bible led to some physical business about an ancient-days evangelist wrestling with a large scroll to keep it from snapping shut.

Stine tried out some new material. Like: “Jesus was an interesting cat, because he was God for thirty-three years, and he only told people about it for three. Don’t you think his friends had to suspect something?” And: “One of the great downsides of being a Christian is that my religion forbids me to hate people.” Beat. “Ohhhh, I want to hate people. That’s what’s so amazing about Christianity—it forces you to act against what your body wants to do. I want to hate! Not that anybody comes to mind right off the bat—France.” Most of this went over well, though a one-liner about Salvador Dali was greeted with puzzled silence.

Stine’s act is built around his rants, which often have the flavor of sermons. He rails against atheists, liberals, Darwinists, pro-choicers, animal-rights activists, moral relativists—pretty much anyone who doesn’t believe that the Bible is the literal truth—with a vitriol that seems to tap into his audience’s own resentments. “This country is changing,” he told the Estes Park crowd. “And there is, in fact, a civil war—of ideology. It’s real.” Stine said that in the future Christians could wind up being imprisoned just for expressing the ultimate tenet of their faith: Accept Jesus Christ as your Saviour or spend eternity in Hell. “Well, what are you saying—I should just believe in Jesus so I don’t go to Hell?” he asked, mockingly. Then he whispered, “Pretty much.” This got a huge laugh and a round of applause. “The message of Jesus never changes; the messenger does,” he said. “Sometimes he looks like me.”



Contemporary Christian comedy’s first real star was a self-proclaimed ex-hippie named Mike Warnke, whose act combined jokes, sermons, and hair-raising tales about his past as a satanic high priest. Between the late seventies and the early nineties, Warnke sold more than a million albums. But in 1992 a pair of born-again investigative reporters revealed that most of his stories weren’t true, and his career fizzled. The big names in Christian comedy today—Chonda Pierce, Ken Davis, and Mark Lowry—look like the churchgoing suburban moms and dads that they are. Their old-fashioned humor, which consists of mild gibes at Christian family life, musical spoofs, funny props, and inspirational testimony, carries a lingering whiff of the fellowship hall and the worship-center rec room.

Stine sees himself less as a Christian comedian than as a comedian who happens to be Christian, one to whom conservative, Bible-believing Americans, who “have never had their own George Carlin,” can point with pride. He also considers himself a subversive and a gadfly, in the tradition of Carlin, Lenny Bruce, Richard Pryor, and Bill Hicks. “Christianity has a lot more gray than fundamentalists want to think about,” he said. “And I’m exploring the gray. Until I run into black. Or white.”

Still, some of his biggest fans are members of the Old Guard. “I think he could even get a Muslim crowd laughing—though he might need a back door to escape,” Jerry Falwell told me recently. “He is cutting-edge, not in any way antiquated, and he has a contemporary look. He’s totally different from most religious comedians. Mark Lowry, who grew up here in our church, is a very bright boy, but he doesn’t try to do the heavy humor that Brad Stine does. Brad is a unique dispenser.”

Stine was born in 1960 in Bremen, Indiana, the second of four children. His father, Jerry, was an auto-body repair-man with show-business aspirations—as the front man for a combo called the Regents, he sang at local bars and night clubs. He was not particularly religious. Stine’s mother, Nancy, was a housewife and a devout Christian. Stine got his first taste of an audience’s laughter in kindergarten. He and a classmate had been chosen to improvise a puppet show. His partner opened with “Let’s play hide-and-seek,” and Stine replied, “O.K., you hide, and I’ll start counting—one, three, nineteen, thirty-two . . .” As Stine remembers it, the bit killed.

When Stine was eight, his parents got divorced. Then they got back together, and moved to Southern California, where Jerry hoped to pursue a singing career. The Stines split up again, this time for good, and Brad decided to stay with his father, whom he worshipped. Stine’s mother, who had returned to Indiana, sent him a magic set for his thirteenth birthday, and he became an accomplished sleight-of-hand man.

Jerry eventually went into business with his brother Chan, a restless schemer who ran ringtoss and basketball-shot concessions at carnivals throughout the Midwest. Stine joined his father on the road for a summer. He thought they were a team, but then Jerry remarried and went back to fixing cars. “Apparently, I wasn’t a priority,” Stine told me. “Whatever we had—or I thought we had—ended then.”

Stine decided to become a professional magician, and managed to get work doing closeup tricks at bars and restaurants in Southern California. He also started teaching himself sideshow stunts, such as eating fire and chewing razor blades, and he put together a comedy act. Whenever the laughs seemed to be getting thin, he would say, “I’ll do anything to make you like me—who wants to see me swallow a sword?” The climax of the routine was a stunt that Stine called “Nose Floss.” It involved inhaling a long piece of string up his nose, pulling it out of his mouth, and tugging it back and forth.

In the late eighties, Stine hooked up with a manager named Chuck Harris, who was known for his eccentric client list. (His latest discovery is a man who has had himself surgically altered to look like a cat.) “Brad played a tape of his act for me, and the back of my hair went up,” Harris recalled not long ago. “It was the worst piece of crap I had ever seen.” But, he said, “I saw the budding of a genius. The man is a genius.”

Harris landed his client a spot on a nine-month cross-country college tour with two other young comedians, Craig Anton and Emery Emery. (“It was stinkin’ brutal,” Stine recalled.) Stine’s colleagues admired his manic energy, though Emery resented his boasting that he didn’t need to rely on four-letter words to get a laugh. (“I think flossing your nose is every bit as shocking as talking about pounding some cunt in the ass,” Emery said recently.) Harris also got Stine his first real comedy-club gig and his first television booking, on Showtime’s “Comedy Club Network.” But when Harris’s assistant moved to a talent agency, Stine followed. Harris was devastated. He told me, “I don’t think Brad thought I was gay, but he could never understand the great love and passion I had for him.”

Stine continued to work, in clubs and on television, but he struggled to define himself as a performer. He dropped the props and the magic. He grew his hair long; he cut his hair short. He took acting lessons and auditioned for sitcoms and movies. He even dusted off his sword and his nasal floss. One night, after a club gig, Stine had a drink with another comic, whose act focussed on her identity as a lesbian. When he told her that he was a Christian, she said, “There’s your hook.”



These days, Stine’s career is under the guidance of Mike Smith, an avuncular Oklahoman in his mid-fifties, who runs an artist-management business out of Franklin, Tennessee, a well-heeled suburb of Nashville. Smith handles contemporary Christian entertainers, among them a “rap core” quintet called 38th Parallel, whose music fuses heavy metal and hip-hop with a Gospel message. Smith oversees every aspect of his artists’ careers, from their wardrobes to their personal development as Christians. “I’m basically representing ministries that deliver the Gospel in unique ways to people who might not otherwise receive it,” he told me over lunch recently.

Smith had Stine meet with Jerry Falwell, who gave him his blessing to tape a live show at his church. Then, instead of approaching one of the “big three” contemporary Christian labels, Smith released the edited result, “Put a Helmet On!,” on his own label, Perpetual Entertainment, whose motto was “Worship is a lifestyle.” So far, “Put a Helmet On!” has sold about forty thousand copies.

Next, Smith got in touch with the Promise Keepers men’s ministry. Started in the early nineties by a former University of Colorado football coach, the group holds cathartic, rock-and-roll-driven conferences (they don’t like the word “rallies”) at arenas around the country. Men are urged to reclaim their roles as leaders of their families and “take back the nation for Christ.”

The Promise Keepers tour last summer introduced Stine to as many as fifteen thousand keyed-up Christian men at a time, in many crucial regional markets. In the fall, Stine went back out and played church and meeting-hall gigs in the suburbs and rural areas outside these same cities. This time, men who had seen him at Promise Keepers events came with wives, children, friends, and other members of their congregations.

To help harness the marketing power of the Evangelical grapevine, Smith brought in a booking agent named Charles Dorris, the head of the Christian-entertainment division at the William Morris Agency, which has had an office in Nashville since 1973. He also hired Bob Elder, a seasoned “life-style Christian” marketing consultant. Elder told me that his job is to look at the market and ask himself, “Where’s God moving in product?”

Smith points to Christ’s injunction, in Matthew, to be the salt of the earth, and cites a book by the late sports-television executive Bob Briner called “Roaring Lambs,” which has become something of an industry bible. Briner takes Christians to task for hiding out in a religious ghetto rather than going forth into the mission fields of mainstream arts and entertainment. “We all live in this little thing that we’ve developed here, and we’ve built walls around us,” Smith told me. “And every once in a while we’ll lob a hand grenade over the wall—protest an abortion clinic or shoot a doctor or something like that—but we’re not impacting culture.”



Two years ago, Stine moved his family to Brentwood, Tennessee, an affluent bedroom community about fifteen minutes from Nashville. Stine, his wife, Desiree, and their two kids, Wyatt and Maycee, live in a thirty-eight-hundred-square-foot neo-Colonial on three-quarters of an acre. When Stine and Desiree met, in the early nineties, she was working as a bartender in Laguna Beach and, though a Christian, was deeply into astrology. Stine had just reached the end of what he calls his prodigal journey—drinking, chasing women, smoking dope. These days, he sometimes has a few glasses of wine with dinner or a pint of Guinness after a show, but otherwise, Desiree told me, “he is so stinkin’ holy it’s disgusting.” Desiree is dark-haired and attractive. Before she met Stine, she spent five years with Wild Mick Brown, the drummer for an eighties hair-metal band called Dokken. This prepared her for being married to a “road dog and moody artist like Brad.”

Stine is an avid and eclectic reader. He owns several editions of the Bible, including “The Message,” a modern paraphrasing that renders, for example, the familiar words of Psalm 66, “Make a joyful noise unto God, all ye lands,” into “All together now—applause for God!” He also owns books about theology, such as C. S. Lewis’s “Mere Christianity,” and about politics, such as “Death by ‘Gun Control’: The Human Cost of Victim Disarmament.” But most of his shelf space is devoted to books about magic, magicians, and sideshow performers: “Magic by Misdirection,” “The Odds Against Me,” “Circus of the Scars.”

For a while, the Stines attended the People’s Church (formerly First Baptist) in nearby Franklin, whose five thousand members can worship, see a production of “Godspell,” go to singles events or divorce support groups, or meet for a latte on its hundred-and-twenty-acre campus. Desiree joined a Bible-study group and started to become part of the church community. But her husband has never felt comfortable in megachurches and prefers his religion intimate and unadorned. Back in California, Stine went to a small nondenominational church in Orange County, whose senior pastor had run topless bars in Hollywood before he was saved. Stine described it as “just the Bible, Jesus, and you.”

Stine doesn’t hang out with Nashville’s other Christian comedians, nor has he joined the Christian Comedy Association. He’s trying to do something new and doesn’t want to be lumped with the others. Stine told me that his life is sometimes lonely, that he feels like an outsider both in the mainstream and among fellow-Christians. The payoff will come when he’s backstage at the “Tonight Show”: he’ll take out an old night-club shot of his father, who died six years ago, and say, “Well, Dad, we made it.” But, as Stine told me many times, he is battling a “liberal-biased media-entertainment structure.” He figured that after having proved himself as a standup for nearly two decades, the only conclusion he could draw from his not being asked onto the “Tonight Show” was that the powers that be were determined not to give airtime to anyone with a conservative or Christian message. I noted that for most of those years Stine had kept his religious and political views to himself. Stine conceded that I might have a point and said that if he gets to perform at “the stinkin’ G.O.P. Convention,” the “Tonight Show” brass will have to pay attention.



Throughout the winter and spring, Stine went on the road and refined his new act. He was accompanied by a wry, efficient young man named J. R. Montes, who used to manage a band called Zona 7, which he described as “a Hispanic Christian Linkin Park.” In York, Pennsylvania, Stine performed at the Praise Center, a hangar-size nondenominational church and television-production facility in the middle of an open field. He had been hired by a local Christian broadcasting entrepreneur, talk-show host, and weight-loss-formula salesman named Jerry Jacobs, who didn’t appear to be a regular user of his own product. Jacobs was hoping to interest Stine in his plan to produce a late-night comedy show, which, he explained, would be “similar to ‘Saturday Night Live,’ only without all the ah-moral tendencies.” He said, “I can’t say, ‘Live from York—it’s Saturday night,’ because my lawyers told me that wouldn’t fly. But I can say, ‘We’re in York, and we’re live, and it’s Saturday night.’”

For thirty dollars a head, the crowd at the Praise Center got to eat chicken, watch promotional videos for “The Passion of the Christ” and Promise Keepers, and listen to Jerry Jacobs give a fund-raising pitch for his television ministry. By the time Stine took the stage, they were ready for a few laughs. “Relax,” he told them. “You’re going to Heaven—enjoy yourselves!” A new bit about Adam naming the animals in the Garden of Eden went over well. So did Stine’s pro-Bush sentiments. “I thank God we’ve got a Texan in the White House,” he said. “You’ll notice the terrorists didn’t attack Texas.”

Outside Asheville, North Carolina, Stine performed at the Arden Presbyterian Church. His dressing room had a rocking chair in it and a sign on the door that read “Brad Stine (Tonight, nursing mothers in case of emergency only).” When Stine ran onstage, the audience jumped to its feet and cheered. For the next hour, Stine moved deftly between religious and political rants (he got particularly exercised about the divorce rate among Christians) and comic business, making the transitions with lines such as “And that’s the problem with these secular humanists.” He also hit a few cultural hot buttons.

Judicial activism: “When they turn around and try to reframe what the Founding Fathers intended for this country, it drives me out of my mind. If Thomas Jefferson were alive today, he’d be sooooo . . . old.”

The Second Amendment: “Guns don’t kill people. Bullets kill people.”

Gay marriage: “Guys want to marry other guys?” Beat. “Cowards!”

Stine wishes that his beliefs didn’t force him to take positions that sometimes hurt people’s feelings, but in the end, he says, “truth trumps everything else.” As a comedian, Stine believes that he must expose cant, hypocrisy, and false ideology; as a Christian, he must spell out the dire consequences awaiting those who fail to recognize the wrongness of their thinking.

“The reckoning day for people like this is going to be more horrific than we can imagine,” Stine told me one afternoon. “And I take that seriously, because I care about people, and I want everybody in. Let’s all get along and go to Heaven, where we’ll dwell with a loving father—God—who won’t leave us, and won’t get divorced, and won’t do all the horrible stinkin’ things we see in this world. Well, I believe it’s going to happen. And I want to be there.”



Earlier this year, Stine flew to New York for a meeting with the former president of the Gospel Music Association, Frank Breeden, who is now the entertainment director for the Republican Convention, and Stine’s agent, Charles Dorris, who is on the G.M.A.’s board of directors. Breeden had already given Stine a boost in 2002 by hiring him to entertain at the G.M.A.’s annual Dove Awards, the Grammys of contemporary Christian music. Now he was talking about bringing Stine back to New York to perform at one of the events or parties connected to the Republican Convention, or maybe at the Convention itself. They also discussed plans for Stine to go to Washington, D.C., to meet with some Republican Party grandees.

A month later, Stine and Mike Smith flew to Washington. In a cab heading toward Pennsylvania Avenue, Stine admitted that he was a little nervous. “This is kind of my ‘Tonight Show,’” he said. “These are people who can make things happen for me that I’ve never even imagined. They’re the gatekeepers.”

Their first meeting, at a Cosí restaurant near the White House, was with an assistant from the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives named Catharine Ryun. Then, in the Hart Senate Office Building, they met with Mark Rodgers, the staff director for the Senate Republican Conference. Later, Rodgers, a protégé of Senator Rick Santorum, of Pennsylvania, told me that he became interested in Stine after his brother-in-law played “Put a Helmet On!” at a family gathering.

Stine and Smith met me for dinner at the Capital Grille, a clubby steak house on Pennsylvania Avenue. Smith—who said, “Man, this place even smells conservative”—was in a buoyant mood. He had just learned that Stine would be receiving the Gospel Music Association’s annual Grady Nutt Humor Award, named for the late comedian Grady Nutt, who was known as the Prime Minister of Humor on “Hee Haw.”

But Stine was more excited about his meeting with Mark Rodgers. He reported that Rodgers had told him, “We can fill you in on the issues and beliefs that are important to our Party and our President, and use you to disseminate our information.” In return, according to Smith, Rodgers offered to “network Brad into all kinds of stuff” and to introduce him to some of his intellectual heroes, including Phillip E. Johnson, the author of “Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds,” and Chuck Colson, the Watergate conspirator, who now runs a prison ministry. “Watch out, Al Franken,” Stine said. “There’s a new sheriff in town.”

This summer, Stine is back on tour with the Promise Keepers, giving the men thirty minutes of new material and a chance to buy his new DVD, “A Conservative Unleashed,” which he shot in April, in Knoxville. The cover shows Stine clutching at a microphone as he is being yanked offstage by, one assumes, the liberal entertainment élite. Both the DVD and Stine’s first book, “Being a Christian Without Being an Idiot: Ten Assumed Truths That Make Us Look Stupid” (which was vetted by Promise Keepers board members), are being distributed by divisions of Warner Music Group.

Sales of the DVDs—and of T-shirts and baseball caps—have been brisk at Promise Keepers events. The organization has started to provide Stine with two bodyguards, who flank him as he signs autographs. In Albany in early June, amid all the guys lined up to meet Stine was a sober-looking middle-aged man who handed him a DVD to sign and said, “My name is John Rowland. I’m the governor of Connecticut, and I’m a big fan of yours.” (This was a few weeks before Rowland resigned.)

In his set, Stine hit some familiar notes. “I’m a conservative, I’m a Christian, and I think the United States is the greatest country that has ever existed on the face of the earth!” he shouted, provoking one of four standing ovations. “And, because of those three belief systems, when I die, by law, I have to be stuffed and mounted and placed in the Smithsonian under the ‘Why He Didn’t Get a Sitcom’ display.”

As it turns out, Lou Weiss, the chairman emeritus of William Morris, watched Stine’s DVD not long ago and said that he’d “never seen anything as out-of-the-box as this young man.” Weiss, who started in the mailroom at William Morris in 1937, has handled Joey Bishop, Buddy Hackett, and Alan King, among others, and he helped launch Bill Cosby’s television career. Now he wants to build a sitcom around Stine, as a put-upon Everyman. The star’s Christianity, Weiss says, will not take center stage. “I respect everybody’s beliefs,” he told me recently. “But putting religion jokes on television is a good way not to be on television anymore.”

Weiss’s view fits with the election-year marketing strategy of Stine and his team, who want to emphasize Stine’s politics more than his religion. Stine has chosen to distance himself from Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, not because he doesn’t respect them but because their names suggest evangelical intolerance. The entertainment lineup for the Republican Convention won’t be announced until later this summer, but Stine is still in the running. And there has been talk of sending him out this fall to stump for President Bush. “I’ve got the ear of the White House—or at least the ear of the people who have the ear of the White House,” Stine said. “This is much more than I ever anticipated when I thought I could learn how to swallow a sword.”

Stine has faith that his journey is being guided by the hand of Providence. He addresses this subject in one of his new routines, which makes fun of bumper stickers that read “god is my co-pilot.” He says, “I think a good rule of thumb is, if God’s in the car, Let. Him. Drive. He’s got insurance. He can talk his way out of tickets. He can knock the radar gun back a couple of notches—nobody’d know.” He goes on, “‘God is my co-pilot’? For crying out loud, this guy is taking charge, and he’s toting God around, like God couldn’t handle himself!” Then, for the punch line, Stine does his God impression: “You take the wheel—I’m not familiar with this area.”

21 November 2004

Peter Goldman's Sad Record of Devastating Timber Communities

The Seattle Times' Pacific Northwest ran a Portrait interview of Peter Goldman. I was very active in lobbying for the Ronald Reagan-signed Wilderness Act in the early 1980's - and then later went to law school with Goldman and his wife. They are very rich, and represent all the concern of a PETA protestor for the human consequences of their brand of 'big stick' environmentalism (for details on projects they support click here and here). Together, they represent what went so very wrong with the environmental movement - and provide insight into why the movement has so little success these days. Here is my opination to the Times Editors in response:

I always enjoy reading Portraits in order to learn new things about the people of our region. In the feature on environmental lawyer/philanthropist Peter Goldman, there was striking insight in the questions – and stark contrast in his responses. Particularly with regard to the way Goldman dealt with loss of logging jobs, in which he cited a visit by the mayor of Pittsburgh. I find that especially ironic – in light of the devastating effects of across the board shut down of the timber industry suffered by many communities in southwestern and central Washington and on the Olympic Peninsula to this day. It would be comparable to a ban on coal mining in and around Pittsburgh. If Goldman had proceeded with philanthropy from his vast fortune based on shared values between environmental protection and human suffering – he would not have worried about resentment. As it stands, Peter Goldman is the ‘poster boy’ for environmentalism without a heart.
(Update twelve hours later: Seattle Times responded by e-mail requesting my permission to run this letter.)
---

So here's their piece. All I can say is, the urban western Washington attitude is just so arrogant :

WRITTEN BY WILLIAM DIETRICH
PHOTOGRAPHED BY BARRY WONG
Peter Goldman Practicing philanthropy



Praised and resented as an environmental attorney, Seattle's Peter Goldman donates his time to watchdog private timber companies.
Q: You don't have to work, do you?
A: Inheritances and investments have given me the opportunity to be financially independent, so I can focus exclusively on philanthropy, community service and raising our three kids. But we've worked every day of our lives.
Q: You direct and substantially fund the Washington Forest Law Center in downtown Seattle?
A: Yes. I went to law school because I believe the law promotes social change. I spent the first 10 years of my career working as a deputy (and later a senior deputy) for King County prosecuting attorney Norm Maleng. Now, I practice public-interest environmental law. We also have a foundation that gives away about $1 million a year, 70 percent of it to environmental causes.
Q: Do we really need another environmental lawyer?
A: The fight for environmental protection needs as many lawyers as possible, particularly free ones!
Q: Didn't the spotted-owl wars settle the logging issue?
A: No way. What we learned from the owl wars in the 1980s was that heavy industrial logging was taking a toll on old growth-dependent species, like the owl. Twenty years later, the owl and salmon remain in steep decline. The battle has broadened from public to private lands as well.
Q: Are more regulations and lawsuits really the way to get there?
A: Unfortunately, the rules for logging on private land do not scientifically protect wildlife and fish. To compel timber companies to protect the environment, they need to believe they'll be sued. Then other groups, like land trusts and certified forestry, work with them to both harvest trees and protect the environment. It's a carrot-and-stick approach.
Q: What's wrong with the state's logging rules?
A: Washington reviews each logging permit separately. No one looks at location or the cumulative impacts of multiple logging permits. The industry says one clear-cut plus one clear-cut plus one clear-cut equals one clear-cut. We say no, it equals three.
Q: Give me an example of where a lawsuit helped.
A: Lawsuits don't permanently protect land, but they do provide protection until things get on the right track. Plum Creek Timber Co. proposed extensive logging in the central Cascades around 1996. Our lawsuits helped make Plum Creek decide to sell and exchange its lands to the federal government. Several thousand acres next to the Alpine Lakes Wilderness area were saved.
Q: Do you have some market-driven ideas?
A: To log land responsibly yields a return of 8 or 9 percent. To do it irresponsibly delivers 12 or 13 percent. Investors are demanding that 12 or 13 percent. Our challenge is to find a way to get the market to help us make up that difference. We can't thrust all the cost on landowners, particularly small ones.
Q: Aren't you just a wealthy guy taking logging jobs from the working poor?
A: The issue of jobs versus the environment is a red herring. If timber companies followed our advice, there would be more jobs in the woods. The fight is all about timber-industry profits, not jobs. Besides, the quality of life is the economic future of this state. When the mayor of Pittsburgh visited out here, he looked at the massive clear-cuts on the Olympic Peninsula and said, 'How the hell can they get away with that?'
Good question.
---
A better question would have been: Peter, what was so wrong with Slade Gorton's active advocacy on behalf of the economically-ravaged communities of timber country - why not help the people of the forest find ways to co-exist with the forest like Slade did? This is the way environmentalism and development are linked in Africa and Asia - why not try it here?

Update: the SeaTimes 'Letter to the Editor' was run February 6, 2005 HERE)

We Are The World, We Are The Rosenblog

Matt Rosenberg scores big (again) with this spot-on run down of blogs as a growing alternative media - particularly with regard to how it is setting up to influence the broader culture in the Puget Sound region:

Puget Sound Blogosphere Expands

There are more and more folk jumping into the blogosphere from in and around Seattle these days. Time for a shout out, and some links (with blogroll additions coming soon).
As in my feature article on Puget Sound bloggers for the December issue of Seattle Magazine (which I hope will be posted online at their web site next month), my focus here is primarily on bloggers who highlight politics or elements of culture apart from geekdom.
Goodness knows I'm fascinated by evolving technologies, and (both here and in my 4/01 to 5/04 regular guest op-ed column in The Seattle Times) have written about the intersections of technology with popular culture and politics. It's a ripe, fascinating area to explore, and changing every day. I admire geeks a lot, especially those who are plugged into politics (my bias, I guess). But if you're evangelizing blogging to the 96 percent of Net users not yet familiar with the medium, (and that's part of my ongoing focus) "inside baseball" techie blogs aren't where you'd want to send them first.
So here are a few more humble "underbloggers" like myself, that I'd like to "tug on your coat about," as Tom Waits would say.
Skor Grimm is a frickin' hoot. This guy is poised for blogosphere stardom, seriously. Give him some love, and comments. OK?
Check out Seth Cooper's Sharks With Lasers.
Here's the Live Journal page of Mark Atwood, a gun-friendly geek with an eye for the intersection of politics and popular culture. He says he's worth $2.9 million. Almost enough for private schooling your kids in Seattle these days.
David Keenan's Seattle Sense hits the spot. Another Seattle Conservative. Damn, we're gonna have to have a Pride parade or something.
In classic blog fashion, Pajama Jihad was created so the author could make sure his letter to the editor got aired publicly, just in case it didn't get printed. He has kept going, with a focus on regional and national politics.
Josef has a blog, too.
Bainbridge-based blogger, scientist, writer, thinker and mom Julie Leung's Seedlings and Sprouts is a good read. She was featured, along with several other West Sound bloggers in a recent piece by The Bremerton/Kitsap Sun. Nice story; the online version includes URLs of a number of West Sound bloggers, but no live links (huhhh?).
Fortunately this post by Julie on her 15 minutes of local MSM fame does include a number of such links (at the bottom), so explore.
And of course, Daily Recycler is already famous.

________________________________________________________________________

The Rosenblog an 'underblogger'? I think not. More like Uber Blogger! That Matt, he is one smooth Populist!

18 November 2004

Seattle's Empty Record of Political Outreach By Democrats

As Democrats around the country continue to assess fallout in the wake of the November 2 election, an abiding theme has emerged: Republicans need to reach out in order to heal a divided nation. ‘Consult with Democratic leaders,’ ‘include popular Democrats in your Cabinet,’ and ‘stay away from legislation eschewed by our rank and file’ – are among the least threatening words of advice offered to President Bush by opposition Democrats.

In response, Republicans need to assess whether these are good faith offers to unite the American people during a time of military conflict – or merely rhetorical puffery designed by wounded party leaders making efforts to head off criticism from within their fold. In making that determination, it is instructive to look at the Democratic methodology and mindset in those areas where Republicans were once a viable part of the political landscape. What happened there, and with what manner of “reach out” do Democrats operate in areas where they have taken over?

Seattle’s own experience with trifling political outreach by victorious Democrats should tell Republicans everything they need to know about Democratic intent. Beginning in the 1970’s, Seattle experienced utter political takedown by the Democrats. In the 1960’s Seattle’s political landscape was broad and diverse by today’s standards – Democrats were strong, but Republicans competitive. Seattle led the nation in promoting women of both parties to public office – both legislative and judicial. The height of Republican influence was probably felt in 1973, when (the late, and great Superior Court Judge for whom I once worked as Law Clerk and Bailiff pro tem) Seattle City Council President Liem Tuai, a second generation Chinese-American, lost a close election to unseat incumbent Wes Uhlman.

The 1970's era also marks Seattle’s fledgling plan to comply with the Supreme Court’s landmark Brown v. Board of Education case – an effort at desegregation seventeen years in the making. During this time I was a voluntary participant in the “desegregation” of two middle schools – one in the north end, the other on Capitol Hill. It was during that time I got to know the children of many of Seattle’s white newsmakers and political officials – parents who no doubt felt vested in the success of this effort. Whether it was salutary to any appreciable degree, I leave for others to decide. But what busing clearly did, to the unconcealed glee of partisan Democrats, was play a key role in the unprecedented nationwide shift of Republicans nationwide - away from urban areas. This “White Flight” is at the heart of ongoing attitudinal disconnect felt by urban-based African Americans against the Republican Party.

Unfortunately the committed liberal Democrats who followed in the wake of so many Republican departures from our cities - have not shown any greater desire to cross perceived segregationist boundaries. Over the following decades Seattle has experienced enormous growth in most decidedly nondiverse private schools – to the point where only New York City has a lower percentage of participation in the public school system. If you ask me, in exchange for “White Flight” we got something far worse - an unbounded liberal approach to urban issues - a state of affairs which only Bill Cosby dares to speak against. Maybe that is why increasing numbers of African Americans are taking a fresh look at the Republicans.

Consider the Seattle political landscape of today. A Republican working in Seattle city government begs a reporter not to “out” him for fear of workplace retaliation. City advisory boards, commissions and volunteer councils are cleansed of Republican involvement by Democratic operatives who, by turn, control nominations, define selection criteria, and vet candidates. City Department Managers meanwhile provide similar access to public employee union bosses. All to ensure the iron-fisted grip of Democrats – concerned by their mere 85% standing among the electorate!

All in all, Democrats need to face up to the unique forms of fundamentalism which mark their brand of politics. As a Republican who is pro-choice, pro-environment, support gay partnership and against the death penalty – my place in the party has never been questioned – nor has my strong advocacy of those positions. Instead, Republican Party leaders have had to reconsider their own perspectives as President Bush has repeatedly enunciated that he would not oppose state-based legislated domestic partnerships for gay couples. This is hardly the fundamentalist theocracy that the Michael Moore-inspired Democrats are screaming about. On the other hand, try holding pro-life and Evangelical Christian viewpoints – and then seek any position of leadership in the Democratic Party. Which party has the more broad, inclusive and “big tent’ perspective now?

Seattle’s “company town” experience under Democratic rule provides the Republicans with all they need to know about how their opponents would operate nationwide if they could. Democrats in Seattle have a thirty year record of paltry outreach aimed at healing between the parties. When given the chance, they enforce a juggernaut and consolidate upon every perquisite. It is in keeping with their worldview - and as it is now clear – a politically fundamentalist worldview. Without understanding that, and without changing that, Democrats show every inclination of becoming a political party in permanent decline.


Sam-Plat Angst Or Cul-de-Sac Conspiracist?

This in the Seattle Times yesterday from disaffected former Republican, now trying-to-please Sammamish Democrat politician Brian Derdowski. Could it be a case of Dino-envy?

That unique form of populism known as Brian Derdowski never fails to confound his audience with tortured logic and angst-ridden befuddlement. Just don't mistake his life with the movie The Big Lebowski - because at least that character - played by Jeff Bridges - and as written by the Coen Brothers - had charm in a slacker kind of way. Derdowski could have done a better job with his op/ed if he had taken a cue from his bowling buddies like in the movie - and gotten some help.

But never mind the bowling buddies, Derdowski has got it all figured out: The Moral Majority is going to leave the Republican fold in anger over corporate sell-out trumping return-to-the-50's legislated ethics. Yeah right (to both presumptions).

"What if the sincere prayers of millions of faithful for a Bush victory are answered with some scandal or profound policy setback? Talk about voter alienation! And what of the concern that many people who disagree with what they perceive as the politics of the church may harden their hearts to the church's fundamental spiritual message?"

Quick, somebody call Billy Graham - because Reverend Derdowski knows something nobody else ever thought about! Gotta call that Theocracy off. Stop the Fundamentalist take over - Brian's telling you its gonna blow up in your face!

Besides, he says - we Puget Sounders are all just plain folks (wink), with me? Good Norman Rockwell-style proletarians all.

"Over the next four years, we may well experience a political earthquake caused by a collision of two tectonic plates of the Republican Party."

No wonder Democrats have made this such a widely circulated "piece" today (this op/ed is near the top of the Seattle Times' most e-mailed columns over the last twenty four hours). But isn't it truly amazing that this is the depths to which Democrat ambition has sunk in dealing with their political competitors on the issues?

Yeah right (again) Brian, that earthquake's going to cut loose just after the Democrats go into schism over Slavery Reparations and from fractious inter-party debate regarding those Democrats who join in the upcoming Congress with further dismantling of the 1960's Great Society "welfare trap" - particularly with regard to education funding.

Oops, come to think of it, THAT could happen.

Okay, Earth to Brian: THE REPUBLICANS ARE MORE UNITED THAN THEY HAVE BEEN AT ANY TIME IN THE PARTY'S HISTORY. The degree of unity, across the board from liberals like me all the way to the campus of Bob Jones University, has been forged based on levels of respect, dialogue and compromise within the Republican Party that are almost spooky (I threw that in to touch off you conspiracy nuts). George W. Bush has accomplished this feat - with a little bit of help from diatribes like yours and a whole bunch of help from that "Karl Rove double agent" known as Michael Moore - who did yeoman work in delivering re-election to the side of truth, justice and the American Way. And delivering as well, utter Democrat befuddlement going forward for quite some time to come.

Keep campaigning Brian, the Republican Party is benefitting more from your efforts as a Democrat than they ever did when you were wearing their label!


On Uganda By Bono At Clinton Library Opening

U-2's Bono and The Edge performed in a Little Rock downpour today at the opening ceremony for the William J. Clinton Presidential Library - and while the New York Times coverage (along with all the other elite media) blew it off - it was very gratifying to hear Bono credit Clinton with (and providing the example of) a tripling of elementary school enrollments in Uganda - made possible by the President's efforts with international debt relief on behalf of the world's twenty seven poorest nations. It was a case of, once again, Uganda 'coming up on radar' in the media. As that country did last week during Tony Blair's meeting with George W. Bush at the White House - where Blair laid out his priorities going forward in partnership with the Bush Administration.

Nice to hear this, as Seattle's own grassroots N.G.O. (Non-Governmental Organization) Sister Schools has been involved with encouragement of Uganda's progress in development through educational achievement - via unique partnership between children in the Puget Sound area and their counterparts throughout Uganda.


Uganda Occupies A Strategic Position In The Heart Of Africa Posted by Hello

10 November 2004

Where Do We Go From Here?

Where Do We Go From Here?
P. Scott Cummins © 2004 The UrbaneR

Madame Attorney General: I have known Dino and Terry Rossi since soon after they moved to Magnolia in the late 1980’s. For anyone at all interested in outreach and service, it would have been hard not to – given all of the energy they threw into this community. Dino invited me into his home on many occasions, priding himself in the kind of hospitality we Americans rave about – upon return from a trip to Tuscany, that is! In other words, his hospitality was genuine. Even though we were both twenty-something’s, I was in awe of Dino’s close friendship with then Palm Springs Mayor (and later Congressman) the late Sonny Bono – as well as the many personal mementoes (and words of encouragement) received from the “The Splendid Splinter” himself – the late Joe DiMaggio. I could clearly see that Dino was seeking out influences and mentors (particularly in the case of Sonny Bono) encouraging to Dino’s desire for greater service through leadership. Madame Attorney General, you know that I have attended several of your ‘kick off breakfast” fundraisers and contributed to your campaigns in the past. But frankly, Madame, on the ability to reach out - you are no Dino Rossi.

Matt Rosenberg is a Seattle-based Blogger that has come into prominence nationally over this political season. Son of a prominent Chicago media personality and professor, and with an insider-journalist pedigree, he has become a Seattle version of novelist Tom Wolfe – someone whose liberal tendencies are transcended by irresistible opportunities to analyze when in comfortable bastions like Manhattan – or our little town on Elliott Bay. Skeptical of co-dependent liberal methodologies and abhorring fundamentalist liberal dogma – yet still, essentially, liberal. I am privileged to say, over the last year he has become my friend. His immediate post-election take from the vaunted Rosenblog website was just too choice not to pass along – with my thoughts amended.

“The "youth vote" strategy tanked for Kerry. No improvement over 2000. Guess all those Indy rock bands, and "Bowl Against Bush" nights didn't do the trick. The GOP ground game, in contrast, was brilliant.” My take: Don’t let anyone tell you that there is no youth vote – they do vote, in large numbers – at least those that go to church and are country music fans. Check out NASCAR-3D on IMAX at the Science Center – that is the “Heartland” of “Flyover” America. And if you equate “Red State” with “Red Neck” you are falling into the same liberal trap that befell Senator Kerry.

“The GOP has captured the mood of the country. Last night, overall, was a kick-butt night for Republicans. They picked up seats in Congress and displaced Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota. Governorships are also falling the GOP's way after last night… with (our state governor) in serious play for Republicans for the first time since 1980(.)” My take: There is historic opportunity for Republicans – both to advance their agenda, and reach out to new supporters.

“The Michael Moore wing of the Democratic Party is dead. Hate and ridicule don't sell.” My take: Did it ever occur to Democrats that their political campaign based on an unending barrage of irreverent invective and vulgar bumper stickers would go way beyond the long-term effect of shoring up the Republican base – and galvanize a historic level of GOP solidarity? Well it did.

“Values DO sell. Agree with it or not, but eleven states passed gay marriage bans. The point for Democrats is not to hyperventilate over that, but to understand the concept of morality is not dirty. They'll need to embrace values other than abortion, diversity, Nanny-statism and provisional ballot-casting.” My take: Case in point - Bush has long been in favor of states-rights based civil union for gay couples (dating back to the 2000 campaign and before). Republicans knew this about their candidate, and despite those conservatives (a minority within the party) that disagreed, they remained in the Republican fold. In other words, Bush has advanced the tipping point of the social fulcrum - toward acceptance of the mainstream gay lifestyle. As Republican policy this has become merely a matter of verbs: “we are partnered” versus “we are married.” Bush is signaling and Republicans will need to meet around the table - to get this codified in our state. Democrats should get off the high horse about gay marriage and make a reasonable domestic partnership law happen.

To imagine that the compass rose of today’s Democratic leadership would again point toward the center-left of John F. Kennedy is unrealistic. The course set for the Democratic future was first steered long ago in the 1940’s - though more by Henry Wallace than Adlai Stevenson - but hey, let’s save the history lesson for another time. Just don’t think for a moment that George Soros doesn’t know this – or want to take advantage of opportunities for his agenda. Regarding the likes of Soros (and Michael Moore), the Democrats are going to have to decide whether the ‘enemy of my enemy is my friend’ or whether he just wants to use you. Most recently this has meant one billionaire’s plan to put another billionaire in the White House - taken off course, though more by failed assumptions about Democrats than assumed truths regarding Republicans. All told, what this means for Democrats is that going forward based on spewed invective regarding the comparative intelligence (or lack of) between them and their loyal opposition will only render them more of:

The same.

And look, as a Republican I have no cause for gloating grin. Voters overwhelmingly passed I-872, the so-called ‘top two’ or Cajun primary law. Under this scenario, without significant revamping of its rightward political slant, the Republican Party may well cease to exist as a viable political entity in urban areas of Western Washington. But mainstream Democrats should take no solace: implementation of I-872 will embolden their Progressive Wing rivals to mount ever-more-fierce challenges fueled by Michael Moore-inspired tactics and rhetoric. Democrats may reap what they have sewed.

It didn’t have to be this way. Particularly here in this legislative district. I have long-speculated that Helen Sommers could have snuffed out any possibility of primary challenge from socialists within her party – if she had overcome her (essentially) loner tendencies and had, over the years of her many terms, simply put out an open call to meet for coffee in the Village, once a week, to anyone. By now she would have amassed an army of adoring community-based supporters. Particularly among the cadre’ of talented mid-career professionals who have taken time to have children. Helen: now would be a great time to start – the future for mainstream Democrats in Seattle is quite frankly in your hands.

Regardless of who becomes Governor after the recount, though it looks more and more like Rossi, that person has an enormous opportunity to help unify us: first by agenda-setting leadership toward Legislative action restoring the open primary system, and then by following President Bush’s suggestion to develop meaningful domestic partner legislation – all without further delay.

05 November 2004

Left Wing Acts On Its Outrage

Deborah Brandt, radio news host on KUOW in Seattle, reported today - in the wake of the election results - how to emigrate FROM the United States and apply to live in CANADA! Web addresses were given, as well as the costs associated with making the move. Canadian authorities report a tremendous spike in the number of hits on their immigration website. Meanwhile, Robert Redford says he is moving to Ireland. (Update: it looks like Drudge is reading the UrbaneR again...)

Here's to hoping it's a trend!

And hey, remember, as you plan your departure - that these countries are part of the U.S. coalition in Iraq. It would be horrible if you mistook these countries for someone who cared...

Albania
Australia
Azerbaijan
Bulgaria
Czech Republic
Denmark
El Salvador
Estonia
Georgia
Hungary
Italy
Japan
Kazakhstan
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Macedonia
Moldova
Mongolia
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Singapore
Slovakia
Thailand
Ukraine
United Kingdom


The Angry Left may finally be coming to understand how normal Americans felt after the 9/11 attacks. A poll on DemocraticUnderground.com asks:
"Which is more depressing, 9/11/01 or 11/3/04?"

The results at this writing:

When terrorists brutally kill 3,000 Americans on 9/11: 29%

When Republicans are reelected by historic margins on 11/3: 71%

I am not making this up. And it is telling, very telling. Now that Republicans have been reelected with convincing, almost insurmountable majorities in Congress - and George W. Bush has received more votes than any other president in history, how does the Left Wing analysis stack up? Do they have a game plan that is going to bring them roaring back next time? Are they countering Republican moves with fresh insight and bold 'strategery'? Hardly. They are whining like children! And grasping at conclusions that say a whole lot more about what is in their hearts than what any evidence suggests: they rant about how the whole thing was a big fix!

Meanwhile, the Left is going nuts about the specter of Right Wing Theocracy. I find this incredibly curious. I promised myself never to characterize the Left in the ways they have labelled me since the 2000 campaign (Dumb, Moron, Vicious, Hater...) but MASS HYSTERICAL PARANOIA does seem to apply here.

My response has been: You're falling into a propaganda trap. It may make you feel better. But it is all propaganda, and worthless, in the end. Better to find those political issues you are passionate about and put your energy into achieving them. These bits of drivel are in no small part why liberals have become Fundamentalist in their viewpoints to the same degree that extreme right wing Christians have - both camps use the same forms of argument, and flash into anger at contrary viewpoints. It will consume you if you let it. If you like, I can put you in touch with mainstream Democrats right here in Seattle who once upon a time had been in leadership and would no doubt join with you in working hard to turn things around for their party.

If I were a true party guy I would be encouraging your hatred - because all of those name-calling stickers and signs out there actually were a huge help to the Republicans. The Democrats did our work for us - they united our factions and brought out energy and commitment. Michael Moore elected George W. Bush - the "fahrenheit factor" was decisive, no doubt about it. All the Republicans had to do was point and say: "See? Told 'ya..."

Just remember that I love politics - I majored in the subject - and studied in England and the Soviet Union. Did a year of graduate school at American U in D.C. - and am a liberal Republican. Like Rudy G, Arnold, Colin Powell and so many more.

As a youngster on the soccer pitch, I learned from a wise coach that if you can keep a smile on your face - it is going to intimidate your opponent. And if you can get your opponent to cuss and whine - they are doing half the work of causing their own defeat - and (in effect) are helping you give 150%! And finally, if you go into a contest without respecting your opponent - those are the competitions that, if you lose, you are going to lose badly. Give it your all, play fair - win or lose show some grace to your opponents. All of these wise coaching maxims have application to the 2004 elections. As a kid, I don't seem to recall having ever been on any teams with the guy who grew up to become chairman of the Democratic National Committee - right Terry McAuliffe?

I cannot countenance name calling by any faction - and am quick to point out to Democrats that it is their self-righteous, fundamentalist attitudes that have rendered them these recent election results. Conversely, I can go down a long list of active Democrats that are center-right and Christian that have been completely shut out of leadership in their party over the last fifteen years - those running the Democratic Party made their choice a long long time ago.

Not a single Republican (and I have been a delegate to district, county and state conventions many times) has ever questioned my right to be a "Republican" based on any issue I support, among them:

- actively working to ban the death penalty (the nation's leader on this is the former Illinois Governor - a Republican);
- pro-choice though feel that abortion is a sin - but back alley abortions would be a far greater sin;
- actively pro-environment, but believe that ANWR and the roadless rule debate are tangents;

As a very good friend who just happens to be a Lesbian Mom told me regarding election day, "I voted for your guys (Bush and Rossi)... because I would rather deal with the terrorists 'there' than 'here' and because my (small) business runs at such tight margins that I cannot deal with any more bureaucratic and tax burdens. And I take you at your word that the government is going to stay out of my bedroom."

But frankly, it was Bush's support for states-rights based domestic partnership legislative options as an alternative to gay marriage that probably swayed her. She, as a homosexual, does not want to associate her 'partnership' with 'marriage' - which given the divorce rate she views as a failed system. Fair enough.

How's that for a start?

Oh, and by the way, I would love to hear a concise definition of the meaning, and see any evidence or facts pointing to a conservative "theocracy" - anything at all. Please, actually.

Palestinean Death Wish Reality Check

I have a new hero: Yosef Lapid, Israel's Justice Minister...

From the Indian High Tech leader, Rediff.com:

According to a report in salon.com, the top Muslim cleric in Jerusalem said Arafat wished to be buried near a holy site there.

The Mufti of Jerusalem, Ikrema Sabri, said that during a meeting four months ago, Arafat asked to be buried near the city's Al Aqsa Mosque, Islam's third holiest shrine.

But Jews revere the site, built on the ruins of the biblical Jewish temples, as the Temple Mount and Israel authorities have already refused the request.

Israel's Justice Minister, Yosef Lapid, was quoted as saying that the city is "where Jewish kings are buried and not Arab terrorists'.

###

Now that is what I like to hear coming from the Israelis! Makes me want to give a big 'ole Howard Dean howl!

(By the way, I no longer link Salon.com - they make it impossible to navigate their site without layer upon layer of ads, and countless subscription hassles.)

04 November 2004

Explaining Republican Rule

Europe and the American Left never bothered to consider George W. Bush as president before now. To them, he was at best a poser - the usurper of that tried-and-true tactic: litigation. Now Bush has been convincingly reelected - and they haven't the faintest idea why. They look at enormous victory margins across the vast number of "red" states, the historic new record for numbers of Americans voting "for" a president, the huge pickup of Republican seats in Congress - and the defeat of the Democrat's own party leader in his home state. The Republican victory was enormous - and so is the elite media's task in beginning the process of understanding the American Heartland. Let's see here, there's something, they say looking at their old friend, the Exit Poll - 20% of Bush voters placed "values" ahead of everything (even terrorism) as the reason they voted Republican. Try as they might, given the slant of "mainstream" journalism everywhere, they haven't a snowball's chance of figuring out what that really means.

In Europe, Christianity has been cached, relegated and derided to the point where it is considered almost completely moribund. For those media elite journalists who do write about that vast mosaic that makes up (that amorphous dynamism called) Christianiy in America, to the extent that they have any interest in it whatsoever - too often impugn elements of brainwashing or heap cynical praise in the manner one might expect in a sports rivalry - in other words, they look at it with all of their personal and competitive baggage obscuring their view.

Right now some of the most dominant, mainstream blogs of the American Left are screaming about this election - decrying the emplacement of institutionalized theocracy based on Right Wing Puritan edict (seriously - check out the Daily Kos, a site that has operated as a Democratic internet "quarterback" throughout the campaign season). What is both ludicrous and hilarious about these viewpoints is that anyone who has any degree of familiarity with Christians is that "they" could never become so unified this side of the Rapture! My recommendation to the American Left and mainstream media: check out comedian Brad Stine for insight on what it is like to be a Christian in America today. And Put A Helmet On!

Nevertheless, this article from The Scotsman is fascinating because it at least attempts to explain American political elections in some meaningful way to the readers there. But do notice "that" city in the U.S. where the writer is based!


Gathering Of Clans That Gave Bush Victory

FRASER NELSON
IN BOSTON


THE victory that George Bush won yesterday will loom large in textbooks of political warfare. How can a president so widely and vehemently hated win one of the largest majorities in American history?

The answer lies in two words: Karl Rove. Mr Bush’s chief political strategist worked out exactly where the battlegrounds would be, studied them obsessively and worked out how to merge all the local battles into one almighty war.

Like the Jacobites at Culloden, the Republicans’ strategy was to raise an army of different clans, fighting in coalition against a common (and regimented) enemy. Unlike Culloden, the clans won.

On election day, Mr Rove raised the anti-gun clan, the anti-abortion clan, the low-tax clan, the family-values clan, the pro-war clan; each cause loyal primarily to itself but coming out to fight for the Republicans on election day.

They were also marshalled into exactly the right areas. Mr Rove worked out which of the 50 states would matter, and he was right. Yesterday’s victory was won by his top three: Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania.

For the past four years, he has been obsessing about this trio: reading all their local newspapers, polling extensively, working out who was most likely to vote and what was likely to make them do it. Using the cold, dispassionate logic which defines his extraordinary career, Mr Rove simply looked at what really fires up these areas and forged policies to suit. He was hunting for clans - and had electronic help.

The Republicans have built a voter-vault, with the names, addresses and social profiles of all target voters. Such people have been precision-bombed with literature and causes, and the formula has worked to perfection. The voter vault (being mirrored in Britain by the Tories) has credit-card information, subscription information - all the facts the party needs to identify someone likely to get out and vote because they want to keep taxes down.

Such voters are sent specific party information, pertinent to their belief. It is junk mail - but tailor-made junk mail. The canvassing has been silently going on for months.

The database allows geographical pin-pointing: Cincinnati, Ohio, was correctly identified as a place which Mr Bush just had to win. This is why he broke with tradition - at some cost to his dignity - to join a ring-round personally on election day.

Rather than a Tony Blair-style "big tent" to pitch at the opposition, the Republicans chose a Thatcher-style radicalism rammed down the throats of its enemies. As the Iron Lady showed three times, this makes for bad headlines but wins elections.

There was no point being emollient to enemy clans, Mr Rove argued. The anti-war movement will always hate Mr Bush - so they should be fought and defeated. Such antagonism would also energise his own clans. Hence, plans to amend the US constitution to ban gay marriage. Senior members of the Republican leadership are not particularly incensed, but the public are. So, ding! Add it to the policy shopping basket: whatever Hicksville wants, Hicksville gets.

The war on terror? Rural America understands and appreciates the cowboy-style "for-us-or-against-us". All the better if this is deplored in New York and Los Angeles - seen as Sodom and Gomorrah in the rural western states.

Even on personality, it was a pitch to the tribes who prefer certainty to slipperiness. "You may not agree with me, but at least you know where I stand," said Mr Bush, ad nauseam. This deeply resonated with voters. He stood for an anti-bourgeoisie way of life.

Mr Kerry’s Democrats had the regular coalition of liberals primarily energised by the anti-war sentiment which is every bit as strong in America as in Europe. But there was one crucial omission: demographics.

The force that returned Mr Bush to the White House against such odds is something the Democratic Party has never quite believed in. Why should millions of America’s poor vote for a man whose policies make them poorer?

Mr Rove took a fundamentally different approach: Americans hold conservative values far dearer than economic self-interest and are more likely to vote along these lines.

The United States is arguably the most ideologically charged nation in the free world. The Democrats wish this not to be true and seem tone deaf to the conservative sound with which Mr Rove is perfectly in tune.

The rival First Ladies illustrated the cultural battle. Laura Bush was a huge campaign asset for the president, a role model for several million conservative Americans who bridle at the suggestion that being a stay-at-home mum is not considered a "job". "She’s never had a proper job in her life," sneered Teresa Heinz Kerry, the billionairess other half of John Kerry. The indignation across the US was palpable: not only is Mrs Bush mother to twins, but she is a former teacher and librarian.

"Perhaps the most important reason to put me back in is so that Laura will be First Lady for four more years," said Mr Bush. He was barely joking.

In an election where the candidate’s wife is the de facto running mate, she had become a conservative icon.

The election was a battle between conservative values and liberal ideas. Values won. This was Mr Rove’s strategy from the beginning. What has staggered the Democrats is how many young voters agreed. Unlike Britain, Christianity is surging across the US - any drive across the swing states shows the unusual sight of new churches, built to accommodate booming congregations.

The lessons of this election will take months to digest. Anyone who finds the result incredible must admit they had not properly understood political America. Mr Bush is the beneficiary - not the mastermind - of a truly historic strategy.

'Bush's Brain' is America's greatest political genius

DUBBED Bush’s Brain, Karl Rove is now credited - even by his enemies - as the greatest political genius in America. A nerdy political hack without university education, he was at large in Texas when it went through its Damascene conversion from Democrat to Republican.

He ran George Bush snr’s failed leadership campaign against Ronald Reagan in 1980, but in 1994 succeeded in taking George W Bush to being Texas governor where he masterminded Mr Bush’s transformation from boozing brat to national leader.

An expert in dirty tricks with a furious temper, he has spent the last decade perfecting how to make the best of his verbally clumsy client.

His lack of ideological fervour is credited with his skill at keeping to successful tactics - his main trick being to link Mr Bush so strongly to evangelical Christians.


03 November 2004

Now, Can America Just Wake Up About Africa?

I hope people will read the news story below without getting too angry at the parody. What this story entirely misses out on, is the profound observation (if this humble American can be so bold): Ugandan people are strong of pride and elegant of style. This respect of self is so necessary in the advancement of self - despite odds and obstacles unimaginable to us in the so-called 'developed' world. The subtext of this story can be underscored by the conclusion that Ugandan people are so very ready to rocket ahead in living standards, educational attainment, and economic well-being. I would only hope that we in Europe and America could 'develop' the attributes they possess so admirably: respect for one another borne of respect for self. Next year Uganda faces an election - and in reflection on how power tips in the balance during that process, they enter it with foreboding. Watching America on this 'day after' the months of ugliness, maybe they have some cause for hope. Regardless, it is long past the time since the media should 'get real' about Africa, as this horrible article makes clear:

Uganda outlaws cast-off knickers
Xan Rice, Kampala, Uganda
November 03, 2004
Is it an insult to wear a vest that belonged to another man, the knickers of a women you've never met, the pyjamas of a child in a foreign land that you will never see? In Uganda, the Government has decided it is.From January, vendors selling mivumba – second-hand clothes given to charity shops in the West and shipped to Africa – will no longer be able to hawk undergarments. No nighties. No bras. And certainly no underpants.
"Studies have shown that diseases such as candida (an invasive parasite that attaches itself to the intestinal wall) can be transmitted by soiled mivumba," said Gyaviira Musoke, the chief inspection officer at the Ugandan National Bureau of Standards. "Besides, it's demeaning to the people. There are certain items that should just not be worn by other people."
Many people in Uganda would agree in principle, but, when it comes down to matters of economics, they have always been ready to trade a dash of dignity for necessity. More than 80 per cent of all clothes sold in the country are cast-offs from Britain, the US, Canada, Japan and the Middle East. Mivumba is much cheaper than new clothes, and the quality is seen to be better, too.
"This ban is a big mistake," said Hawa Nabisubi, 38, a petticoat seller at Owino market, a sprawling 10ha bazaar in downtown Kampala famous for its second-hand clothes. She said her camisoles, which sell for about 2250 shillings ($1.70), typically lasted a year while more expensive new garments were finished after a month's continued wear.

Shoppers were also unhappy. Olivia Nassimbya, 26, the owner of Olivia's Unisex Hair Salon at the market, said: "When I buy underwear here, I first soak it to make sure it's clean, and then there is no problem. We are poor, these clothes are cheap and each piece is unique."
Some traders fear the new law is the beginning of the end for mivumba. Local textile manufacturers have been lobbying for a ban on the clothes, as they cannot compete on price. The Government has introduced import taxes on mivumba, but this has had little effect on demand. An outright ban would be deeply unpopular, for the cast-off clothing industry has developed into a super-slick operation employing tens of thousands of people in an entire support industry.
The whirr of sewing machines competes with traders' cries and music blaring on the radios at Owino market, as women repair torn clothing.
Men work the ironing boards, using ancient irons heated on open fires to work out creases before the clothes go on display.
A boy walks around with a bucket of dried fish, ensuring shoppers and retailers do not go hungry. A man with a pan full of fried white ants does a brisk trade.
Vendors know what sells best and choose their stock from the wholesalers carefully. British suits are afforded pride of place in the suit stalls. "The UK makes the best suits," Paul Ssali, 38, said, sitting in front of his stall. "Marks and Spencer especially."