30 April 2005

British Move Angers Museveni on Aid Cut

KAMPALA, April 30 (Xinhuanet) -- Uganda has expressed anger over the British government's position of cutting 17 billion shillings (9.9 million US dollar) aid citing inconsistencies in the political transition process in the African country.

The British High Commission in Kampala announced on Friday that the British government was withholding 9.9 million dollars as aid to Uganda for failure to make sufficient progress toward establishing a fair basis for multiparty system of governance.

Ugandan Minister of State for Information Nsaba Buturo said Saturday that government is relaxed and is going to look for alternative sources of funding.

He said there is no problem with the political transition process despite a few drawbacks, which are not of governments making.

"Yes we agreed on the conditions of the aid, but who knew that parliament would delay the motion of holding a referendum for Ugandans to decide whether they should be governed under the multiparty system," said Nsaba Buturo, adding that Britain should look at the reality on the ground.

He noted that if Britain is to give aid to Uganda, it should bein good faith and not with stringent conditions.

"This shows that our partners have vested interests in the internal affairs of Uganda and we argue that this is wrong," said Buturo.

According to a British High Commission statement issued on Friday, the British government aid to Uganda will be cut more if the east African country does not conform to the set conditions agreed on with the Ugandan government.

Urbane Analysis: And you thought only Michael Jackson lived with Peter Pan in NeverNeverland - welcome to the world of Uganda's ruling oligarchy. With a population of over 25 million people, almost half of whom are in African-style poverty (which means DESPERATE conditions, which you cannot imagine unless you been been there and really gotten involved with it), in a country about the size of Oregon - all wrapped up in an economy about the size of an average American zip code. Meanwhile, over half (about $1.4 billion of the government budget) comes from donor nations - the U.S. and Europe. All that to pay for a strongman government that is in no way a democracy: a sorry state of affairs that we bought and paid for. Why the U.S. and European governments will not support development of an established political opposition like the Forum for Democratic Change (FDC), and true democratic reforms, is going to anger the American public as they begin to learn about this story from the mainstream media. Andrea Mitchell, Martin Savage, Christiane Amanpour, Walter Rodgers, William La Jeunesse, Steve Harrigan, Andrea Catherwood, Andrew North, Nic Robertson, Bridget Kendall (there, that's ten - just from television - there are 50 more in print media), are you going to let Rwanda '94 morph into Uganda '06 without troubling yourself about the issue until the blood flows?

It is already happening in northern Uganda: tens of thousands of children disappeared, kidnapped.

Many of them brainwashed into service as child soldiers - murdering at will. Learn more about that (if you dare) here.

And in eastern Uganda, this is what you need - just to herd some cattle.

What we need are a few "foreign correspondents" with the "right stuff" to make it out of five star hotel once in a while. The kind of journalist who can endure a little hardship. And get the story, even if it might involve a "Year of Living Dangerously"

28 April 2005

Blair Government "Calls the Question" on Uganda's Museveni


Britain's moral suasion on global issues today is peerless. And given that the government of Prime Minister Tony Blair has made 2005 the year to focus on true progress on development and political reform in Africa, all this might be viewed as inevitable - if not painfully inexorable.

Events are moving rapidly in Uganda. Today the British High Commission in Kampala signalled the intent of donor nations with regard to the ruling Museveni regime. Uganda's government budget is largely funded by donor nations - particularly the United Kingdom and the United States. Ireland and Scandinavia are significant secondary funders as well. But they all take their signals from London. The UK seems to be coming down on the side of democracy in Uganda, and is perhaps becoming increasingly responsive to this call from the united Ugandan opposition party - called the Forum for Democratic Change. Read what Ugandan president Yoweri Museveni says in the following story. Is he indicating that he would rather allow Uganda's descent into violence, civil war, and even more atrocious deprivation than already subjected under his despotism - that he would allow that to happen - rather than give up his ruling perquisites of greed and endemic corruption? The news media should be asking Museveni for clarification of his statements. If he means what he says below - then his grip on reality is called into question. The specter of another horrible meltdown in Africa is just too great not to get onto these issues.

Britain Blocks Aid to Uganda

The Monitor (Kampala)
April 29, 2005
Hussein Bogere
Kampala

The British government has withheld about Shs17 billion in aid to Uganda since last month citing concerns about the handling of several aspects of the country's political transition.

A statement from the British High Commission says Britain was also particularly unhappy with the progress made towards establishing a level playing field for parties in the country.

"When our last release of the budget support fell due in March we were concerned by several aspects of the transition, including that insufficient progress had been made towards establishing a fair basis for a multi-party system. We withheld 5 million pounds," the statement signed by Mr Nikesh Mehta, the 2nd Secretary External Political at the British High Commission, Kampala says.

Mehta's statement was in response to calls by the opposition Forum for Democratic Change for donors to freeze aid to Uganda.

FDC was prompted to write to the diplomatic community asking for a freeze on aid after the arrest of two MPs Reagan Okumu and Michael Ocula, a week ago. The two were arrested and charged with the murder of Alfred Bongomin, the LC 3 council chairman of Pabbo sub-county in Gulu in February 2002.

When The Monitor probed further this week about the British government's stand on the FDC request, Mr Mehta said further that the next tranche of aid due in September will also be subject to an assessment.

"Britain provides budget support that is linked to government performance in implementing the Poverty Eradication Action Plan (PEAP), including governance issues.

The next tranche falls in September when there will be an assessment of performance against an agreed set of indicators (derived from the PEAP) that cover the process of political transition alongside macro-economic and sector policy," the statement said.

After writing, FDC met several officials from several embassies including Denmark, Norway, US, the European Union, Britain, Ireland, among others last Friday.

In their letter FDC requested for a temporary suspension of foreign aid to prove to President Museveni that democracy is the only option and that terror will not be tolerated.

FDC's spokesman Mr Wafula Oguttu told The Monitor last Monday that the diplomatic community was hesitant to freeze aid to Uganda abruptly because it had a moral obligation towards the people of Uganda.
He said donors pledged to cut aid to a bare minimum in the next budget. The donors contribute more than 52% to Uganda's budget.

As the former colonial power with the longest association with Kampala, Britain's actions towards Uganda tends to guide other donors in assessing their relationship with the country.

The donors have increasingly come out to criticise several aspects of the transition including the proposed constitutional amendments especially about lifting of presidential term limits to allow a third term for President Yoweri Museveni.

They have also criticised the need for a referendum, which would cost about Shs 30 billion yet both sides, the government and the opposition, are going to campaign for the same thing - allowing multipartyism.

The president has on several occasions shot back at the donors' interest in the country's politics. Museveni at one time told a donors meeting in Kampala on May 16 2001 that he would not entertain them meddling into his government affairs.

He warned that Africa is witnessing conflict, but could unite and fight [donors] "like we fought" the colonialists.

"I don't know why you want to recreate all this tension all the time. So much of this arrogance, I find very annoying. It should not be there. I advise you against it," Museveni warned, adding that he could afford to reject donor handouts.

26 April 2005

NASA: Future of Hubble Space Telescope Still Up In The Air


We owe a lot to NASA for, among many things: advances in astronomy, myriad technologies, and a whole different notion of what government can accomplish. And sure, giving Tom Wolfe and Ron Howard all kinds of creative inspiration is good too.

This is the Hubble Space Telescope, which is reponsible for wonders like the image below.

Last time the Hubble needed a bunch of work - the mission was difficult and dangerous. The proposal that robots do the work needed - without extraordinary risk to human life - is no longer under consideration according to new NASA Administrator Mike Griffin. But a human mission to keep Hubble working is once again a possibility. I sure would like to hear a reasonable debate about repair versus replacement - perhaps with an entirely new (accessible) module attached to the International Space Station.

Okay, so there it is - a post about space exploration. But what the hell, Star Wars: Episode III - The Revenge of the Sith is due out May 19. And hey, all you raving cynics out there, indulge yourself in The Spoof. Live Long & Prosper, fellow Vulcans.

About the Road Back to Peace

120 years ago today John Wilkes Booth was tracked down and killed by Federal Troops - two days before, at Ford's Theater in Washington - he had assassinated President Abraham Lincoln. It was the beginning of a peace going very sideways in the settling dust of horrible carnage called the American Civil War. This painting by Mort Kunstler tells quite a story. Only three weeks before, the soldiers themselves had shown a way toward reconciliation. The description of the scene is below. As brave proponents of democracy around the world continue in their proud struggles, I hope that this image will continually rise up to further heights of prominence among the many important events of that era - as a reminder to all of us.

They faced each other in two long straight lines - just as they had so many times before on so many bloody fields of fire. This time was different. Three days earlier, General Robert E. Lee had surrendered the skeletal remnants of his hard-fighting Army of Northern Virginia to General Ulysses S. Grant in farmer Wilmer McLean's parlor. Now it was time for the Sons of the South to lay down their arms and give up their bloodied battle flags. As enemies, these men in blue and gray had faced each other at Petersburg and Cold Harbor, at Gettysburg and Chancellorsville, at Fredericksburg and Antietam, at Second Manassas and Malvern Hill. Now they again stood in great ranks opposite each other - one now the victor, the other now the vanquished.

Placed in command of receiving the Southern surrender was Brigadier General Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, a Northern war hero who bore four battle wounds inflicted by these men in gray and butternut now assembled before him. Absent in Chamberlain, however, was any animosity toward these former foes; present instead was a sense of respect for fellow countrymen who had given their all in the grip of war.

At Chamberlain's order, there was no jeering. No beating of drums, no chorus of cheers nor other unseemly celebration in the face of a fallen foe. "Before us in proud humiliation," Chamberlain would later recall, "stood the embodiment of manhood: men whom neither toils and sufferings, nor the fact of death, nor disaster, nor hopelessness could bend from their resolve; standing before us now, thin, worn, and famished, but erect, and with eyes looking level into ours, waking memories that bound us together as no other bond. Was not such manhood to be welcomed back into a Union so tested and assured?"

At Chamberlain's command, the Northern troops receiving the surrender shifted their weapons to "carry arms" - a soldier's salute, delivered in respect to the defeated Southerners standing before them. Confederate General John B. Gordon, immediately recognized this remarkable, generous gesture offered by fellow Americans - and responded with a like salute. Honor answering honor. Then it was over. And a new day had begun - built on this salute of honor at Appomattox. Former foes both North and South - in mutual respect and mutual toleration - now faced the future together. As Americans all.

22 April 2005

Uganda Coalition to U.S.: Quit Feeding the Beast


This is U.S. Ambassador to Uganda Jimmy Kolker signing away more American tax dollars to the regime of President Yoweri Museveni. This photo depicts a tiny little grant of over $300,000 - so Finance Minister Gerald Sendawula came over to pick up the check. And don't get me wrong - I think our government has its heart in the right place. The "big picture" view goes something like: "if we can get them reliant on these technology tools for managing their operations (rather than cash in the envelope), then we stand a chance of catching a clue regarding this whole "transparency and accountability thing" - at least that's what we're hoping."
There is a problem with this pipe dream. The coalition of tribes, regions, religions and viewpoints that has come together to form a coherent political opposition in Uganda says we are spitting into the wind. And that organization, called the Forum for Democratic Change(FDC), has called on the U.S. and donor nations to quit feeding the beast known as Uganda's Museveni regime. This report from the BBC outlines the case. The FDC website linked above goes into even more detail. The united Ugandan opposition deserve to receive a public response from the U.S. and - quite frankly - a hearing before the G-8 on this issue - which may well happen as this article from The Forward outlines.

What's happening right now in Ugandan involves lame, even farcical attempts by the Museveni regime to sew confusion and misgiving regarding the mere specter of democracy there. What this Reuters report fails to even mention, apart from the fact that a murder happened some three years ago, is covered here at the FDC blogsite regarding the spurious nature of the arrest (followed hard on the heels by the need for "delay" in the prosecution) of opposition members of Parliament - as well as two other Ugandans that were earlier arrested, then cleared after international pressure - and now (once again) re-arrested.

In response the opposition FDC has concluded that cutting off the money flow may be the only way to get the attention of the Museveni regime. The BBC reports:

In a letter to diplomats, the FDC says "a temporary suspension of foreign aid may prove to Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni that democracy is the only option and that terror will not be tolerated".


And Ambassador Kolker, in all due respect and deference to the difficulty of your position: if we do not begin hearing from you and Secretary Rice about this issue, shall we voice our displeasure at this turn of events directly to her, or to President Bush? And would you prefer the hearings be held on the House or Senate side? You can look forward to spending some quality time with Henry Hyde's committee on the House side - and I'm sure Dick Lugar will be delighted to see you. But don't count on Joe Biden to be too pleasant - as you explain how Uganda went, on your watch, from a shining light in Africa, to a seething cauldron of civil war: financed by the American taxpayer.

Or, to put it another way, Ambassador Kolker: don't be caught looking like the Bag Man in a Rudy Giuliani sting of organized crime. The problem is simply this: too many American people, from church aid circles to billion dollar NGOs, have "connected" with the people of Uganda to let this thing slip by. Uganda is representative of far too much projected aspiration by unified people ("of one mind") from Kampala to Kansas City. And in many ways, our East Africa policy is symbollic of the overall effort to head-off the effects of anti-U.S. extremism via non-military means.

Representatives of the Uganda-focused NGO with which I am most closely associated (a delegation of ten) met with you yesterday. You heard from them, as you have heard from others. That fact of the USA's providing nigh onto half of Uganda's government budget is an enormous moral burden. Requiring moral courage. Now. Before civil unrest. Now.


Urbane Update: Recalling that I am firmly in the Republican mainstream, Christian missionary do-gooder-type NGO camp, check out this perspective from the Left, a boots-on-the-ground protestor type by the name of Peter Quaranto - that I found just after posting my piece earlier this evening. An uncannily similar perspective. Scary when that happens. And it bolsters OUR shared point (singular).

Of Real Estate and World Class Art

The fifty story "old" SeaFirst building at 1001 Fourth Avenue will soon be sold to a Texas-based developer, the Puget Sound Business Journal reports today. No big deal, another $100 million real estate deal in downtown Seattle. The important question is, will this sale imperil the celebrated Henry Moore sculpture Vertebrae - the most important work of internationally-recognized public art in Seattle since it was unveiled here over thirty years ago.

Vertebrae has long done for Seattle what, it seems, the ambitions of many community leaders could not: put Seattle "on the map" artistically. Gracing the public plaza directly across from the Rem Koolhaas' designed Seattle Public Library, it is a quiet element of what, these days, can only be called "old" Seattle.

And let's get this straight, I am NO fan of that library building - to me it is evocative of Leni Riefenstahl on a bad acid trip. Its Hippie-Nazi styling cues almost perfectly sum up the state of affairs in Seattle today.

And that's why Vertrebrae, just across the street, is important. It reminds us all what the modernist perspective can be when an element of good taste is involved. The Hines real estate group, though Texas-based, is not a stranger to these parts. They have been landlord to properties in Bellevue and Kirkland. We will be looking forward to their assurance that Vertebrae stays in place along Fourth Avenue.

Urbane Update: The Seattle Art Museum (SAM) now owns Vertebrae - and apparently has a long-term deal to keep it on Fourth Avenue. SAM, ever the transparent and easily scrutable organization (not!) owns dem bones...

06 April 2005

Follow The Example Of Our Youth

I Give You the Next “Greatest Generation”
P. Scott Cummins © 2005 The Urbane R

This past week saw release of the Child Well-Being Index, an annual report from the Foundation for Child Development – which noted ten and twelve year lows among teens in pregnancies, alcohol abuse and criminal offenses. In response to this Jeffrey Butts, director of youth justice programs for the Urban Institute proclaimed: “Maybe we have the next ‘greatest generation’ coming along.” My response is to say emphatically: let’s drop the ‘maybe’ – because looking around there can be little doubt: today’s youth culture is the next “greatest generation” – and we have bellwether examples to celebrate right here in our community.

Youth culture has become an enormous positive influence in society. This is in no small part because the internet, online web logs (“blogs”) and other forms of communication allow high-achieving young people to find each other, be encouraged, challenged and fulfilled. Because of the web - you can meet-up, power-up and take off with a synergistic bounce.

The mark of prior generations has been ambition and drive in commerce and professions. Today, making one’s mark in youth culture is derived by no less ambition and drive – but through the power of ideas and creativity.


ActingOnAIDS asks: Do You See Orange?

Let me give you an example from right here in our own community. Making their homes on Queen Anne and Magnolia are three recent graduates of Seattle Pacific University. Last year they created a project called Acting on Aids – which is a powerful creative concept helping participants viscerally see and feel the impact of HIV/AIDS. The program is designed to encourage personal commitment and action in response to what the disease is doing to people worldwide. To make it all the more powerful, participants experience this from the perspective of the orphans AIDS leaves behind. Flash forward one year: Jackie Yoshimura, James Pedrick and Lisa Krohn have created a partnership with Federal Way-based World Vision - and brought the program out to over forty college campuses around the country.
Acting on AIDS takes elements of the 1960’s Civil Rights and Anti-War movements – reminiscent of teach-ins and campus theater - and applies it to frustration regarding the global AIDS pandemic and the virulent poverty which allows the disease to fester.


Jesse Harris (age 19) Motion Picture Director

And then there is Jesse Harris – who graduated from Seattle's Ballard High School last year – and now has the major motion picture “Living Life” set to premier this Friday April 8. As a sophomore Harris wrote the screenplay about a young man’s triumph in the face of terminal illness. By his senior year he had shot the movie, and used his own college funds to fund the project’s development. His film garnered an audience choice award from the Bay Area’s prestigious Orinda Film Festival. This led to a post-production and distribution contract - with a major Hollywood movie distributor. And that brings us to this coming weekend, the most important weekend of Jesse Harris’ life: when his movie will officially debut at the Landmark Metro Cinema in the University District.

Which is where this all started: why is it that a teenager in Seattle can write, hire a cast and production team, direct, and then shepherd the release of a major motion picture? Of course Jesse Harris is a rare and talented individual. And there is a team of talented collaborators, such as Seattle's John Jeffcoat of Strangelife Productions, who provided “big budget” quality as film editor on Living Life. And Harris, true to form, credits the skill and mentoring of his collaborators for making the project successful.

But that underscores the point: that many talented and experienced movie professionals allowed a teenager to be in charge. I spent four hours with Harris this past weekend: he would strike you as any nineteen year old might. True, Harris exudes a complex mixture of friendly confidence and laser-like ability to focus. And he measures his responses like a seasoned diplomat. But his normal teenager-becoming-a-man characteristics are all there as well. So what is it? I can see it in Jesse Harris: he has tapped into the power of creativity and ideas. Get in touch with that, and all the rest (including the big business elements of a Hollywood movie) will follow.

In Living Life, seventeen year old Jason Miller (played by Benjamin P. Garman in what looks to be a breakout role) learns he is dealing with a very serious metastasized late-stage neuroblastoma (abdominal) cancer. His grandfather (movingly portrayed by veteran film actor Dick Arnold) has been estranged from the family for many years – but because of his grandson’s grave illness, insists on spending time with him. In a beautiful scene done on a rowboat in Green Lake, Jason asks his grandfather:

“Have you ever wanted to do something really great for a person, something wonderful that actually affects their lives?”

This theme underscores the entire movie. Harris admits that at film festivals and test screenings “people tell me, like in their twenties and thirties, that it (the movie) changed the way they think. People are relating to loss, to family, to what this all means for them personally. I’m not like a religious person. And the film does not come off as preachy. But all of a sudden the message just hits.”

And people are deeply moved. “I want people thinking about it, talking about it” Harris admits. And people tell him in thinking about encountering crisis in their lives “they learned how to react, and what they would do based on the movie.”

This movie is deeply spiritual because it underscores that value in life comes from opening up to love: the capacity to love and be loved. This theme, in a major motion picture made by a Seattle teenager, provides ample signs we have found our next “greatest generation.”

The decision on whether to give Living Life a wide national release will be based in no small part on how many of us see the movie over the next two weeks at Seattle’s Landmark Metro Cinemas - www.landmarktheaters.com What better way to show our support for all that can be good in society than to get behind a special film by an important new director? See you at the movies.

For tickets and movie times at the Landmark Metro Cinema in Seattle's University District, click here.

Don't let anyone look down on you because you are young, but set an example for the believers -
in speech, in life, in love, in faith and in purity.

1 Timothy 4:12

05 April 2005

Time For Your Voice On King County Medical Examiner Scandal

The news business is competitive - but it sure as heck isn't a sport. It is hard-edged, get-it-first and put-it-out-right kind of hard work. When it comes to the ongoing problems with King County government, the issues have very little of the WOW! factor going for them. It is tedious and boring to uncover the big stories, and sometimes it can take days (or months) to confirm one little fact needed to "air it out" publicly. But it is incredibly important work.

That's why reporters who take on tough stories deserve our thanks. In particular, Chris Halsne at KIRO television news deserves to get an e-mail "atta way" for breaking this story: the King County Medical Examiner brain scandal relates to fundamentally important questions about respect - and what has happened to the culture of public service in our region. The issues raised in these reports deserve a full airing - and corrective action. E-mail a note to Chris here.

Also to thank is Rick Anderson of the Seattle Weekly. Getting into issues that other journalists find too complicated or not-sexy-enough has distinguished the career of this veteran reporter - while serving the public of our region admirably. You can e-mail Rick at: randerson@seattleweekly.com

Be unfailingly polite, on-point, and encouraging. And tell 'em to keep hammering on this story!

-Urbane R

(Tomorrow I will put up a post about another way we can exercise "people power" and send a message against the Culture of Death in our community - in support of that you can play an important role in sending a message that goes nationwide: All you have to do is go to the movies...)

04 April 2005

Weekly's Rick Anderson: Scandal Nothing New for Alonzo Plough

This 15 month old story from the Seattle Weekly points to more serious ongoing problems with operation and oversight of the King County Medical Examiner:

Death and Lapses A fired medical-examiner employee sues, claiming things stink at the morgue

by Rick Anderson
Seattle Weekly
January 14 - 20, 2004

The King County Medical Examiner’s office investigated 1,683 of the county’s 13,008 deaths in 2002.

THE YEAR 2003 ended with the biggest mystery in the King County Medical Examiner's Office still unsolved: Who stole a baby's remains from the morgue? The prime suspect—in the media, at least—was a custodian named Manuel Franco, 33, who last month pleaded guilty to lesser charges and was sentenced to time served, then freed. Never charged in the body theft, Franco earlier told Seattle Weekly he didn't take the baby's remains (see "Where Is Baby Perry?" June 18, 2003).

It wasn't the first body to go missing from the coolers. The remains of five people in the past two decades have been permanently or temporarily lost at the morgue, at Harborview Medical Center.

Now former ME investigator Don Halberg has thickened the plot. Not only was the story of the lost baby kept from the public for seven months, he says, office paperwork on the remains was also lost, then replaced as part of a cover-up. Additionally, the cooler area, contrary to county claims, was accessible by outsiders because the door had been broken for years, and a set of keys was stolen from a desk only months before the baby disappeared, says Halberg.

Such screwups supposedly weren't that rare. In just the past few years, body parts have been "misplaced," a person still alive in a hospital was logged as dead, a deceased rock star's identity was mishandled, and boxes of evidence from the Green River serial- murder case were used to prop open a door to a public hallway.

Then there were those internal conflicts, says Halberg, who was also the examiners' union president: An office contest awarding $10 for the most grisly death-scene photos, a boss who showed up at work wearing a bulletproof vest, and a series of labor disputes that included the awarding of more than $150,000 in sexual-harassment settlements.

Halberg, who was fired from his county job in February—the same month the missing baby case was leaked to the media—has filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Seattle seeking damages from the county. An ME employee since 1999, he claims he suffered retaliation and eventual termination because of his union activity and for blowing the whistle on mismanagement and misconduct. He says he has 800 pages of evidence, including examiner documents, office memos, and e-mails.

Public Health Seattle-King County, which oversees ME operations, disputes Halberg's claims. But James Apa, spokesperson for health director Alonzo Plough, says neither the department nor the chief medical examiner, Dr. Richard Harruff, can comment on Halberg's specific charges, per county policy on pending litigation. Apa did confirm continuing internal problems at the ME's office, which investigated 1,683 of the county's 13,008 deaths in 2002.

One top official was recently placed on administrative leave for reasons the department won't explain, but, says Apa, it's "part of an internal investigation being conducted by an independent [outside] investigator."

Halberg maintains he was considered a good employee until he intervened in separate sexual-harassment complaints by two female workers. He concedes he was disciplined for mistakes, such as failing to immediately notify Child Protective Services of the death of a child. But he claims he was unfairly punished and labeled a troublemaker for complaining about the conduct and profanity of fellow workers.

He also reported incidents of office theft, vandalism, and security breeches as far back as 2001, a year before Baby Perry was taken, he says. After the county began retaliating as part of a "witch hunt," Halberg says, he began gathering and recording the evidence he is now using to argue his lawsuit.

"The medical examiner's office has long been plagued with mismanagement and security problems," claims Halberg's attorney, David Schoenborn. "Mr. Halberg's blowing the whistle on misconduct made him the target of further retaliation."

Among Halberg's accusations:

*One of the office's lead investigators had a private sideline in crime/trauma scene restoration and cleanup. He passed out fliers in the office that were printed on office equipment during work time, using office paper.

*A top ME official came to work wearing a bulletproof vest but wouldn't explain why, saying only, "It's under control."

*In late 2000, the office announced a contest offering a cash reward for the investigator who brought in the most gruesome picture of a dead body from the prior week. According to an e-mail, the first winner won $10. The contest is apparently no longer being held.

*After Baby Perry's body went missing sometime in May 2002, officials learned that required daily body inventories had not been done for a year and that a cooler door lock had been broken for at least that long. The door to the garage leading to the cooler was left open on a regular basis because of a backed-up drain and noxious gasses.

*In December 2002, an investigator "took possession of a foot" as part of a death investigation but did not log the foot into the case file or post it on an inventory board in the investigators' section. The investigator "didn't tell anyone that the foot was in-house, which subsequently caused considerable confusion." Halberg says the foot was ultimately found in a cooler and logged as required.

*In 2002, Halberg found what he calls "two boxes of missing evidence" from the Green River murders that were being used "for some time" to hold open a door leading into the public hospital hallway.

"A lot of the evidence the office maintained was handled in a haphazard manner," says attorney Schoenborn.

*In a series of 2002 lapses, an investigator logged the death of a Harborview patient into the office computer, but the person was, in fact, alive; a pathologist, during an examination of a body in a suspicious-death case, overlooked the fact that the decedent had been shot; and the identity of Alice in Chains rock star Layne Staley wasn't entered into the office computer or passed down the line, causing "a notable delay in positively IDing the body," says Schoenborn (see "Smack Is Back," Jan. 8, 2003).

The county, while refusing comment, says it will vigorously challenge Halberg's lawsuit.

02 April 2005

Same Practices as King County's Brings Maine Lawsuits

Fourth lawsuit filed over harvesting of brains
Associated Press

PORTLAND, Maine — A fourth lawsuit filed against an alleged brain harvesting operation in Maine seeks class-action status and asks that damages be paid to dozens of unnamed families whose loved ones' brains were taken.

Filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Portland, the lawsuit alleges wrongdoing in the harvesting of brains at the medical examiner´s office in Augusta. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for the families of every decedent whose brain was harvested in Maine between 1999 and 2003.

One plaintiff is named in the case brought by attorney Gregory Hansel. Anne Mozingo, of York, says she only consented to donate tissue samples, not her late husband's entire brain, after he died of an aneurysm five years ago.

Mozingo, 42, is a former reporter for the Portsmouth Herald newspaper. She says she took notes during an April 25, 2000, telephone call seeking her donation to the Stanley Medical Research Institute of Bethesda, Md.
Lawyers for the Stanley institute and its associate director for laboratory research, Dr. E. Fuller Torrey, said they expect their clients to prevail.

Tom Laprade, who represents the institute, said that as with previous lawsuits, "we feel that the institute will be vindicated when the facts come out in light of the law under which it operates."

The defendants named in the lawsuit include Maine´s former funeral inspector Matthew Cyr and an associate who witnessed phone calls seeking consent.

Mozingo, whose husband died of a brain aneurysm five years ago, she didn´t give much thought to Cyr´s donation request until she was contacted by investigators.

"I'm filing this suit because I want to stand up for what is right," she said.

"This case is about a lack of respect for the living and a lack of respect for the dead."

A federal judge would have to determine that all of an estimated 99 families share similar circumstances in order for the lawsuit to become class-action.
The Stanley institute uses its brain bank for research on the causes of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The lab is suspending its brain-collection efforts nationwide for reasons unrelated to the controversy in Maine.
___

Information from: Portland Press Herald: www.pressherald.com

(Hat Tip to Chaps, much obliged!)

01 April 2005

King County Signed Contract to Profit From Autopsies: Selling Brains of Mentally Ill


Ron Sims & Alonzo Plough: What did they know, and when did they know it? Who did they tell?


Here is a link to the contract that was to be signed by King County Director of Public Health Dr. Alonzo Plough, which contains (apparently) the signature of someone else. This agreement outlines Stanley Medical Research Institute (SMRI) placing a doctor in the King County Medical Examiner(KCME) pathology facilities to harvest brain tissue from pathology examinations - with payment to KCME for doing so. This was an agreement made internal to KCME - there is no evidence from these documents that other government entitites exercised oversight over this relationship. Is Ron Sims exercising proper oversight of the KCME? What are the county guidelines for this kind of arrangement? What about the questions raised by the families in the KIRO report, noted below?

SMRI holds King County harmless from liability for actions of their employee - and SMRI agrees "to abide by Washington State laws and all other applicable laws, rules and regulations relating to data privacy or confidentiality..."

Consent forms needed to authorize the taking of brain tissue from deceased mentally ill patients are included with the contract at the link above. As the KIRO report indicates, those forms were not used - with KCME staff claiming they opted instead for telephone contact and verbal permission from next of kin/guardians. They relay on a section of RCW 68.50.550 that allows a phone call to be recorded, then "reduced to writing" and "signed by the recipient of the communication." Does this mean a transcript of the phone call/message? Hardly, the interpretation was watered down to the point where a staffer apparently signs off on a form that a phone call was made.

The contracts also outlines some $203,000 annually to the KCME to pay for a MD pathologist and other staff.

This link at KIRO News outlines the amounts paid to the KCME between 1995 and 2004.

Urbane Analysis: The questions raised here are obvious.

Where was the oversight by the King County Executive - and the King County Board of Public Health?

Where briefings given to elected officials to make them aware of this arrangement, and were hearings held by the Board of Public Health (as well as both the King County and Seattle City Councils - which share oversight of Public Health for citizens).

Like Watergate, the questions distill down to: what did they know and when did they know it? Where else does this happen around the United States?

Why don't Ron Sims and Alonzo Plough understand how morally wrong it is to trade in human flesh when the person involved has not authorized it? And to make it worse: the company is actually allowed to place its people inside the government facilities involved, in a collosal lack of judgement that eliminates effective oversight over those employees.

The KIRO report (below) raises more questions about the "culture" of government in our region - as it relates to serious breaches of ethics - which should be afforded to maintain dignity for the dead - and how that seriously devalues both the memories of people who fall under KCME "jurisdiction" as well as the impact such actions have on friends and families: those who remember.

What gave rise to this kind of "backroom" deal needs extensive investigations with public hearings, and well as review by ethicists, to ensure that the rights of families and the deceased are respected.

This is a serious breach of public trust. We need a truly independent Board of Medical Ethics conducting watchdog oversight of the King County Public Heath Department - an agency which is being "rubber stamped" by its own Board (made up of King County and Seattle City Council members).

Coroner Profits Without Consent From Tissue Sales

Team 7 Investigation: King County Trades Human Brains For Money

Chris Halsne
KIRO 7 Eyewitness News Investigative Reporter

SEATTLE -- The King County Medical Examiner's Office has been harvesting brains from the corpses of mentally ill clients and quietly trading the tissue for money, KIRO Team 7 Investigators report.

In the past seven years, the medical examiner's office received more than $1 million for collecting brains of people with schizophrenia.

In return for the money, county pathologists shipped at least 180 brains to a private research facility.

A Team 7 Investigation raises serious questions about consent: Why didn't next of kin know about the financial arrangement?

Folks on Vashon Island called him "Cool Gary," a local schizophrenic who loved hitchhiking and playing practical jokes.

When Gary died jumping into traffic in November 1998, his body wound up at the King County Morgue.

Less than 72 hours later, Gary's brain was removed and mailed to Bethesda, Md. It became property of The Stanley Medical Research Institute, a multimillion-dollar company that studies mental disorders.

"I can't believe what is happening here," said Bill Lynn, Gary's father.

Bill Lynn says he's never heard of Stanley. He at first thought KIRO Team 7 Investigators were kidding when we showed him proof that King County profited from harvesting his son's brain.

"You're crazy! I didn't raise my kids to sell 'em. This is unreasonable. Why would I agree with any hospital or anybody to receive any money for any body parts? No way! I'm just not built that way," Lynn said.

So what about this written "consent form" provided to KIRO Team 7 Investigators by King County as proof that Bill authorized the brain donation?

"Something is rotten in Denmark, that's for sure. No, I never, I didn't sign anything. That's not my writing here," Lynn said.

Here's what Lynn says did happen: The Medical Examiner's office called on the phone, asking for a "skin and brain tissue donation."

"They didn't tell me they were going to sell it. I'd have said 'no' right off the bat," said Lynn.

Lynn's story is a familiar one. KIRO Team 7 Investigators contacted a half dozen families, which we confirmed had donated brains via King County. None knew of Stanley. None knew of money changing hands.

"It was my feeling that they were maybe going to run some tests on his brain tissue," said Vicki Hendricks.

Hendricks's son Jim died suddenly at 36 years old. She gave permission for King County to take brain "samples" thinking they needed them to determine cause of death. Jim's whole brain instead ended up at Stanley Medical.

"Those are public servants, people we rely on to be there for us, and if you can't feel comfortable with them, then it's kind of scary," Hendricks said.

Under the Open Records Act, KIRO Team 7 Investigators asked King County for documents surrounding what's known around the morgue as "The Stanley Project."

Contracts vary a little each year, but the one in 2003 said "the KCME will try to collect a minimum of 50 specimens." For those efforts, Stanley sent big monthly checks to the medical examiner's office -- far exceeding the true costs of removing and shipping brains.

"That's a huge breach of public trust," said Dr. Elliot Stern.

Stern is a recognized expert in donation ethics. He says King County has big trouble ahead. If next-of-kin are not fully informed, courts consider that no consent at all.

"I would not have made a donation," Dr. Stern said. "I don't know a reasonable person who would have made a donation knowing money was going to change hands and enter county coffers in excess of harvesting costs."

Lynn feels betrayed and is clearly angry about the lack of full disclosure.

"Those butchers over there, I wonder how many body parts they salvaged off him," Lynn said.

KIRO Team 7 Investigators have uncovered a discrepancy between the number of brains sent to Stanley and the number of brain donor consent forms on file at King County. More brains were shipped than consent forms. That means some next-of-kin may not have been contacted at all.

Nobody at the medical examiner's office has yet agreed to an interview, but a spokesperson told us on the phone that the King County Medical Examiner's Office broke no laws by using a simple phone call to request brain donations.

He also said the money exchanged was a "grant," not a payment made per brain, and that there were no "quotas" for brains, just "goals."

KIRO Eyewitness News Update: more families step forward in protest, and say they were never consulted when their family members brains were taken at autopsy.